1). In Arizona, it is illegal for donkeys to sleep in bathtubs
2). In Arkansas, it’s illegal to mispronounce Arkansas
3). In Connecticut, a pickle cannot be considered pickle unless it bounce
4). In Florida, if an elephant is tied to a parking meter, the parking fee has to be pain as it would for a real vehicle
5). In Hawaii, coins are not allowed to be placed in ones ear.
6). In Idaho, it’s illegal to give someone a box of chocolates weighing more than 50 pounds
7). In Iowa, one armed piano players must by law, perform for free.
8). In Missouri is illegal to drive with an uncaged bear
9). In OHIO it’s illegal to get a fish drink
It was a dark and misty night... I was on the search for a bountey hunter... I needed a K9, and a partner.. I found out that Patty Mayo could help me. So we both followed a blue truck their. WE thought it was sus because it was driving super duper fast. So the driver of the blue truck got out and RAN. he RAN as fast as he could. We ended up getting him, he was the guy I was look for... he has a 1,000,000$ Bond.
The end :)
(I might be late but eh it was fun to write)
Answer:
It held that the defendants, My Web, with respect to the fraud allegations against them, had satisfied minimum contacts.
Explanation:
In the civil procedure law of the United States, minimum contacts is a legal term used to assert jurisdiction of a state court over a defendant which is from another state. By marketing its products in Idaho through its website, from where the company Blimka was able to place the order for jeans, My Web's activities provided the basis to establish minimum contacts, thus allowing the court in Idaho to assert jurisdiction. This falls under the Internet Activities portion.
Answer: sum1 u don't know asks you to deposit a check sometimes for several thousand dollars, and usually for more than you are owed and send money to another person
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
The four liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners are:
1. person who is admitted as a partner to an existing firm apart from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by that particular admission alone become liable for anything which is done before the person becomes a partner.
2. A person admitted as a general partner into a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership that already exists does not by the admission alone become liable for things done before the individual became a general partner.
3. A partner who retires from a firm other than limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the partnership debts and the obligations that were incurred before the retirement of the partner.
4. A partner who retires from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership
doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the liabilities of the firm that were incurred before the retirement of the partner for which the partner were liable.