Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, the missing question read;
Version 1: George walks away. He never talks to Elaine or Jerry again.
Version 2: George confronts Elaine, saying “I am angry about what you have been saying. I do not want you spreading rumors about me. If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
Version 3: George yells at Elaine to shut u.p and then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired.
Version 4: George demands that Elaine tell him where she heard that. Elaine tells him not to worry about it and tries to crack a joke about how much the boss is late.
Answer:
- <u>Version 1: non-confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 2: cooperative</u>
- <u>Version 3: confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 4: confrontational and cooperative</u>
Explanation:
1. In this scenario it is evident that George avoids confrontation with Elaine. In fact, we are told that "[He] walks away..."
2. In this scenario, however, we notice a cooperative deposition between George and Elaine. He made this lear when he said, "...If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
3. Confrontation occurs in this scenario as we are told that "George... then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired. "
4. By demanding "that Elaine tells him where she heard that" indicates confrontation. While Elaine's cracking a joke about how much the boss is late shows cooperation.
Answer:
The correct answer is (C)
Explanation:
Negative externalities occur when an individual or firm making a choice negatively affect other parties. A driver who recklessly drives a car on a busy highway is a negative externality because the amusement of the driver is negatively affecting other people. A negative externality arises when the benefit of a decision is less than the negative outcomes of that decision.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: False.
Explanation:
To begin with, the price discrimination strategy refers to a technique used by the companies in order to charge different prices to the different consumers regarding the fact of how much would they be able to pay for the product. When it comes to monopolies, a perfect price discrimination strategy would try as best as possible to capture the majority of the zone known as the <em>"consumer surplus"</em>. And that is why that a company with a perfect price discrimination would face a small deadweight loss area due to the fact that with that strategy of price the monopolist will absorve as much as possible of that area becuase the triangle is half consumer surplus and half producer surplus.
Answer:
The tax consequences of the distribution to Montclair in 20X3 would be a $150,000 gain recognized and a reduction in E&P of $175,000.
Explanation:
The distribution company distinguishes profit on the distribution, which is included in E&P netting of tax and decreases E&P by rhe lands fair market value fewer the liability believed by the shareholders.
Therefore, The tax consequences of the distribution to Montclair in 20X3 would be a $150,000 gain recognized and a reduction in E&P of $175,000.
