Answer:
1. What is the probability that they will lose both contracts?
probability of losing both contracts = (1 - 40%) x (1 - 65%) = 21%
2. What is the probability that they win only one contract?
probability of winning 1 contract = 1 probability of winning both contracts - probability of not winning any contract = 1 - 21% - 26% = 53%
3. What is the probability that they win both contracts?
the probability of winning both contracts = probability of winning first contract x probability of winning second contract = 40% x 65% = 26%
Answer:
A. Closure
Explanation:
Closure refers to the desire by man to find an answer to a question or a problem, looking for ways to fill in the gap in order to make sense of things that aren't adding up. It drives an aversion towards equivocality. People tend to find closure to make meaning of something or a stimulus that is incomplete. In this scenario, Brandon having problem with is Visa application was the problem/question/stimulus, and his method for closure or as a manner of filling in the gap was assuming every other applicant in his category had the same Visa issue.
One technological advance I have experienced in detail was the conversion from Imperial to the metric system in Canada especially in the mines I worked at. The advantage was that now everything could be done in 10's like millimeters, centimeters, metres and kilometers for example. The drawback would be that I was accustomed to say with cars to use miles per gallon and I had a hard time to envisage kilometres per liter. Another innovation I experienced first hand was the development of the GPS. This made it easier to locate oneself in the field provided there was good satellite reception and at least for the handheld GPS the accuracy was only down to about +-5meters so was not exact. Only the more expensive GPS like the Trimble could zero one in with sub-centimetre accuracy.
Answer:
A security
Explanation:
A security is defined as an item that holds financial value and represents ownership of a property by the holder. It is used as a means of gaining some financial assistance.
The security acts something a creditor can use to get back their money in case the debtor fails to pay up.
In this case Pro-Racket takes the bill of lading to the local bank and uses it to obtain funds to hold the company over until final payment is received from the foreign distributor.
The Bill of lading here has been used as a security to obtain a loan from the bank
Answer:
Eddith Carolina could accept to take on the new cosmetic line, while Michael Sanders may reject same.
Explanation:
Eddith Carolina, been the president of the company, has shown that he's a risk taker. The idea behind this is that he is open to new opportunities that could otherwise improve his holdings and networth. The decision to take on a new cosmetic line is therefore in line with the policy of the President of the company. The implication is that Eddith Carolina is tilted to accepting the proposal.
Michael Sanders, on the other hand, is an ordinary employee. Even though he is the manager of the division, he bears no risk of ownership. And in an event of liquidation or solvency, he simply has no big collateral to part with, unlike the Eddith Carolinas. What individual like Michael Sanders are interested in is the protection of their job and income. Knowing the nature of an employee as conservative and risk averse and the fear of not loosing their paid job, it is therefore not surprising that Michael Sanders could reject the new cosmetic line bid.