A company in monopolistic opposition produces an allocatively green output degree even as a company in best opposition produces a productively green output degree.
The long-run equilibrium answer in monopolistic opposition usually produces 0 monetary income at a factor to the left of the minimal of the common overall value curve. The life of excessive limitations to access prevents corporations from coming into the marketplace even withinside the long run.
Therefore, it's far viable for the monopolist to keep away from opposition and hold making tremendous monetary income withinside the long run. One feature of a monopolist is that it's far a income maximizer. Since there's no opposition in a monopolistic marketplace, a monopolist can manage the charge and the amount demanded. The degree of output that maximizes a monopoly's income is calculated through equating its marginal value to its marginal revenue.
Learn more about company in monopolistic here:
brainly.com/question/25717627
#SPJ4
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Mr Chavez did not increase his assets or his net worth."
<span>Mr Chavez has assets of S250.000 and liabilities of $18 000 Hedecides to finance the entire amount of tho purchase of a carvalued at S20000. That statement is true.</span>
<span>Weber would consider this an exercise in power in the social stratification model. The owner has the ability to have others do what he wants them to do. He is able to set goals that can be achieved even with others opposing them.</span>
