The private market will produce more than the economically efficient output level. Also when there is a negative externality then the cost to producers will be less than the cost to society. Remember that a negative externality is a cost that is suffered by a third party as a result of an economic transaction. Also have in mins that externalities lead to market failure<span> because the price equilibrium </span>does<span> not reflect the true costs and benefits of a product.</span>
Answer:
You would have $1,251 more money in second city bank than the first city bank.
Explanation:
First city bank pays 7% simple interest.
Interest = (PRT)/100
Interest = (6000 * 7 * 9)/100 = 378000/100 = $3,780
Amount in first city bank after 9 years = 6000 + 3780 = $9,780
The second city bank pays 7% interest compounded annually, so we would find the amount after 9 years.
P = $6,000
R = 7% = 7/100 = 0.07
T = 9
A = P(1 + R) ^ {t}\\
A = 6000(1 + 0.07)^ {9}\\
A = 6000(1.07)^{9}\\
A = 6000 * 1.838459212420\\
A = 11030.75527452\\
A = 11031
Amount after 9 years in second city bank = $11,031
Difference between first city bank and second city bank: 11031 - 9780 = 1251.
A long term goal is something that a person has that requires planning and most of the time, involves their career or what they want to do in the future, Something that isn't going to come to an end anytime soon. So, the answer is 4.
Answer:
$480,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what total relevant costs to make the part internally are
First step is to calculate Relevant cost per unit:
Relevant cost per unit:
Direct materials $6
Direct labor $24
Variable manufacturing overhead $12
Fixed manufacturing overhead ($15 × 0.40) $6
Relevant manufacturing cost $48
Now let determine the Total relevant costs to make the part internally
Total relevant costs to take the part internally=($48 × 10,000)
Total relevant costs to make the part internally = $480,000
Therefore total relevant costs to make the part internally are $480,000
Answer:
If an economist argues that everyone gains from trade, the following reasoning is most likely underlying her argument:
- Production according to the principle of comparative advantage lowers overall costs and therefore allows both countries to have a higher standard of living.
Explanation:
- The comparative advantage refer to the situation in which an individual, company or a country offers its services and products at a lower rate as compared to its competitor. This leads to trade-off as you have to comprise for the gain of something.
- This comparative advantage also increase the dependencies of nations or companies on each other.
- For example, England and Portugal has benefited from this comparative advantage concept as England get the wine at lower cost from Portugal and Portugal also get earning by selling this wine to England.
