Which scenario describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent

Which plan helps people prepare for and respond to an emergency?

suter [353]

Response plan, evacuation plan, and containment plan.

6 0

3 years ago

Describe an argument that States' Rights advocates might use to make their case that the centralization is a bad thing. Include

erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

The concept or argument of this States’ Rights advocates of states’ rights has placed a much greater belief and confidence in decentralized or regional governments than that of the centralized government. According to their arguments, state governments, regional government are more proactive, responsive, concerned and has that popular control, more sensitive to local issues and problems, and of course they have more understanding of their culture and values which the state’s upholds. Some the reason for the argument about centralized system of government being bad is as follows:

1) Remote control

The organization’s executives are under tremendous pressure to formulate decisions for the organization, and they lack control over the implementation process. The failure of executives to decentralize the decision-making process adds a lot of work to their desk

2) Bureaucratic leadership

Centralized management resembles a dictatorial form of leadership where employees are only expected to deliver results according to what the top executives assigned them. Employees are unable to contribute to the decision-making process of the organization, and they are merely implementers of decisions made at the higher level.

3 0

4 years ago

Mengapa kebebasan beragama berhubungan dengan hak asasi manusia (ham)? Sebutkan dan jelaskan!

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

(HAM) Hak Asasi Manusia. Merupakan suatu konsep etika politik modern dengan gagasan pokok penghargaan dan penghormatan terhadap manusia dan kemanusiaan. Gagasan ini membawa kepada sebuah tuntutan moral tentang bagaimana seharusnya manusia memperlakukan sesamanya manusia. Terutama moral tersebut sejatinya merupakan ajaran inti dari semua agama. sebab, semua agama mengajarkan pentingnya penghargaan dan penghormatan pada setiap manusia tanpa ada pembelaan dan diskriminasi

(hal inilah yang mebghubungkan kebebaaan beragama dengan Hak Asasi Manusia)

Note :

Hai... You are an Indonesian?

8 0

3 years ago

Vladimir owns a small store with a back room

Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

murder

Explanation:

if im right plz give branliest

8 0

3 years ago

Steps taken for arrest warrant

Effectus [21]

Answer:

Steps in a Trial

Arrest Procedures

When an officer arrests someone, the accused is taken into custody. Similarly, when a grand jury returns an indictment or a prosecutor files an information, a judge or magistrate issues a warrant for the arrest of the person charged if not already under arrest, and the person is taken into custody. (Sometimes, for less serious offenses, defendants are issued citations to appear rather than being arrested.)

When people are taken into custody, before they are questioned, they must be informed that anything they say may be held against them in a court of law, and that they have the right to remain silent,

consult with a lawyer before and during questioning, and

have a lawyer appointed to represent them if they cannot afford one.

They are also told that they can exercise these rights at any time. In some states, there may be variation in this statement for juveniles. For example, juveniles might be warned that if the juvenile court waives jurisdiction over them, then the statements they make can be used against them in a court proceeding in which they will be tried as an adult.

These are often referred to as the Miranda rights because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1966 in Miranda v. Arizona that when law enforcement officers question people taken into custody, the evidence garnered from their interview cannot be used against them unless they have been informed of their constitutional rights to counsel and to remain silent.

If a person has been arrested without a warrant, law enforcement officials may hold him or her for a period of time necessary to handle certain administrative tasks (fingerprinting, checking to see if the person is the subject of any outstanding warrants, etc.) This time may vary depending on the facts of the particular case, but it’s generally quite brief, usually no more than 48 hours. They may not hold the person beyond that time without an initial or first appearance or arraignment before a judge or magistrate (a public official vested with certain judicial powers in the federal system and the systems of some states).

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago