1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pentagon [3]
4 years ago
8

A law which promotes the opportunity for foreign workers to obtain employment, housing, and medical care regardless of their cit

izenship status would likely fall under which school of jurisprudential thought?
Law
1 answer:
slavikrds [6]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Natural law school of thought

Explanation:

Jurisprudence refers to the study of legal rules and principles used by the courts to arrive at decisions. Such a study helps in gaining better understanding of laws and their application.

Natural law is the aspect of law which is based upon rational and reasonable theories which apply to all, and which define what would constitute moral misconduct or illegal conduct in general. It is also referred to as "laws of nature".

Natural law's existence is not altered or amended unlike other laws and rules, which are specific and amended from time to time to include new clauses or insert a new section.

This theory conveys an inter-linkage between legal rules and morality.

Since this school of thought is generally applicable to masses, it defines and promotes the opportunities for foreign workers to obtain employment, housing and medical care available to all irrespective of their citizenship, nationality or ethnicity.

You might be interested in
Which of the following amendments would protect you in the scenario found in the following question?
ANEK [815]
That would go against the 10th amendment say states make their own laws
3 0
3 years ago
What happens in collective bargining
Veronika [31]

Collective bargaining is the process in which working people, through their unions, negotiate contracts with their employers to determine their terms of employment, including pay, benefits, hours, leave, job health and safety policies, ways to balance work and family, and more. Collective bargaining is a way to solve workplace problems.

5 0
4 years ago
How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement about sales taxes is true?
NemiM [27]
I’m not too sure but it may be C.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following documents was responsible for limiting the power of King John in 1215? A. the Magna Carta B. the English
grigory [225]

The correct answer is A. The Magna Carta

Explanation:

In 1215, King John who was the ruler of England accepted to sign a document known as "The Magna Carta". In this important document, the king agreed to limit his power and protect certain rights. Indeed, through this document it was established the payments requested by the King should have a limit and some citizens (mainly noble citizens) had certain liberties including the right to own property. Moreover, this document is relevant even today because it was the base for other documents that protected civilians' rights.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which situational condition decreases the chances of crimes?
    12·1 answer
  • The government can take your property for
    12·2 answers
  • 6. Insatiable Industries sues Tidbit Technologies for stealing their delicious recipes
    12·1 answer
  • Pesticides are regulated by the
    13·1 answer
  • महर्षि दयानंद का निर्वाण होने पर इन्होंने<br>ऋषि ऋण चुकाने के लिए क्या किया ?​
    5·1 answer
  • Find the solution to the system of equations
    9·1 answer
  • Give an example of Psychological theory.
    7·2 answers
  • Look at Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015).
    10·1 answer
  • Does this mean god will still let me in heaven for changing my religion?
    15·1 answer
  • Is it illegal to record a conversation without the other person knowing
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!