The U.S Supreme Court pronounced the balancing test in the Turner v. Safley case. The balancing test means that the courts must balance the rights of inmates against the penological concerns of security and order.
In this case, the U.S Supreme Court upheld broad restriction on inmate-to-inmate correspondence and, in the process, reaffirmed its commitment to a deferential standard in prisoner speech cases.
In Justice O’Connor’s opinion in Turner v. Safley, he identified four factors to consider when applying this standard:
- Whether or not there is a valid, rational link between the regulation and the governmental interest advanced to justify it;
- Whether inmates are left with alternative means of exercising the right that the regulation restricts;
- Whether accommodating the asserted right would have a significant ripple effect on fellow inmates or prison staff;
- And whether there is a ready alternative to the regulation that fully accommodates the asserted right at a minimal cost to valid penological interests.
To know more about penology here-
brainly.com/question/28043931
#SPJ4
A settlement owned and ruled by a different country is a colony, if that's what you are asking
<span>The rights of citizens are protected from government intervention under the Bill of Rights. These first 10 amendments elucidated the relationship of the national government to that of the states, as well as those of the citizens. The rights are not absolute, but have been open to expansion and clarification in the years since the Constitution was adopted.</span>
The answer is A, because an HOV lane is used for people with 2 or more persons in the vehicle. There is usually a set time that people can use the HOV lane. It was made like that because people thought that when somebody would carpool or drive a coworker to their job, it would be a much faster and convinent way because the speed limit is higher in the HOV lane.
