Question

The biggest danger of relying on case-study evidence is that it A)is based on naturalistic observation.B)may be unrepresentative of what is generally true.C) overestimates the importance of operational definitions. D) leads us to underestimate the causal relationships between events

Answer 1

Answer:

The most significant danger of relying on case-study evidence is that it may be unrepresentative of what is generally true

Therefore the correct answer is Option B

Explanation:

Case studies are incredibly valuable to increase very accurate records from individual cases that are significant in brain science. The detailed information inside these studies is essential for adding to help or refute hypotheses inside the field of brain research.

Although they can't be repeated or summed up, the outcomes are substantial, and they give more prominent data to further research to attempt to develop.

Answer 2

Answer:

(B) May be unrepresentative of what is generally true

Explanation:

Case-study is a type of research that usually focus on an in-depth investigation of an individual or group with characteristics that are uncommon to the population at large. Because of the unique condition displayed by the subject of the research, case studies don’t contain many research subjects, and the condition displayed during the research study are not representative of the population.  

Thus, because of this, case-study findings cannot be generalized, making (B) the best option.