The answer is "agenda setting theory".
Agenda setting portrays an intense impact of the media – the capacity to disclose to us what issues are important.Agenda-setting is the making of open mindfulness and worry of remarkable issues by the news media. This theory appears to be very fitting to enable us to comprehend the unavoidable part of the media (for instance on political correspondence frameworks).
It is backed by a valuable asset,
which is also known as secured credit.
Answer:
Some members could be alarmed but it doesn't necessarily mean that Community Hospital has lower-quality care than Middle Hospital and University Hospital. It is important to identify that this alarm could also come from the increased economic pressure on hospitals.
R.W. Dubois, R.H. Brook and W.H. Rogers (1987) have studied the death rate index as a potential screen for quality of medical care since the 80s. In their article, they state that hospital with higher death rates "may provide inadequate quality of care or have uniquely ills patient populations." This would lead the Quality Task Force to explore and define the ills patient population of the Community Hospital.
Mary E.Goss and Joseph I. Reed (1974) explore the quality evaluating practices of hospital care through severity-adjusted death rates in the 70s. Their analysis suggested that differences in technological adequacy, control status and teaching status of the hospitals partially support the validity of death rate as a quality index; but "the index is too dependent of the local population".
Therefore a population characterization must be necessary to bring up in this discussion as a cohort study. Goss and Reed also stated that the death rate "may be more productive in the long run". This means that the death rate would be better estimated in a longitudinal study as a quality care index.
References:
Dubois, R. W., Brook, R. H., & Rogers, W. H. (1987). Adjusted hospital death rates: a potential screen for quality of medical care. American journal of public health, 77(9), 1162–1166. doi:10.2105/ajph.77.9.1162
Mary E. W. Goss and Joseph I. Reed, Medical Care, Vol. 12, No. 3 (Mar., 1974), pp. 202-213
The answer to the question above is 61%.
In the year of 2005, the Gallup poll asks respondents how they would rate the honesty and ethical standards of the people in the different fields and the answer to this is 61%.
