1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
3 years ago
11

Park Company's perpetual inventory records indicate the following transactions in the month of June: Units Cost/Unit Inventory,

June 1 200 $3.20 Purchases: June 3 200 3.50 June 17 250 3.60 June 24 300 3.65 Sales: June 6 300 June 21 200 June 27 150a. Compute the cost of goods sold for June and the inventory at the end of June, using each of the following cost flow assumptions:1. FIFO2. LIFO3. Average costb. If Park Company uses IFRS, which of the previous alternatives would be acceptable, and why?
Business
1 answer:
abruzzese [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1. FIFO : Cost of Goods Sold (650 units):

June 6    300 units:      200 units at 3.20              640

                                       100 units at 3.50                    350

June 21   200 units:      100 units at 3.50                    350

                                         100 units at 3.60                    360

June 27    150 units:      150 units at 3.60                    540  

                                            total                                   2,240

(200 x3.20) + [(200 x 3.50) + (250 x 3.60) + (300 x 3.65)] - 2,240 =

=  640           +              2,695                           -            2,240 = 1,095

2)  LIFO : Cost of Goods Sold (650 units):

June 6     300 units:    100 units at 3.20          320.0

                                       200 unit at 3.50         700.00

June 21    200 units at 3.60                             720.00

June 27    150 units  at 3.65                             547.50

                                                                             2287.50

Ending Inventory (300 units):

     640                     + 2695      -          2287.50          =        1047.50

100 units at 3.20 =      320.00

 50 units at 3.60 =        180.00

150 units at 3.65 =         547.50

                                       1047.50

3. Average Cost :

June 1 - Beginning Inventory                200 units at 3.20   640

June 3 - Purchases                                 200 units at 3.50   700

June 3 -  Balance                                   400 units at 3.35      1340

June 6 -  Sales                                    300 units at 3.35         1005

June 6 -  Balance                        100 units at 3.35          335

June 17 - Purchases                250 units at 3.60        900

June 17 - Balance                   350 units at 3.53    1235

June 21 - sales                  200 units at 3.53         706)

June 21  - Balance                 150 units at 3.53       529

June 24 - Purchase         300 units at 3.65             1095

June 24 -  Balance                 450 units at 3.61     1624

June 27 - Sales                   150 units at 3.61                 541

June 30 - Balance                300 units at 3.61      1083

Cost of Goods Sold           650 units      1005 + 706 +541                  

                                                                                2252

Ending Inventory (300 units at 3.61)                      1083

Rounded

You might be interested in
Inacio Corporation uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data concerning the first processing departme
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

Inacio Corporation

The cost per equivalent unit for materials for the month in the first processing department is closest to:

= $14.50

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

                                                        Units    Materials    Conversion

Beginning work in process           2,300     $14,400      $6,500

Percentage of completion                              75%           20%

Units started during the month   11,000

Total units available                     13,300

Units transferred to the next       9,900      100%         100%

Ending work in process               3,400        90%          30%

Costs added during the month               $173,500    $243,500

Equivalent units of production:

                                                          Units    Materials        Conversion

Units transferred to the next       9,900      9,900 (100%)   9,900 (100%)

Ending work in process               3,400       3,060 (90%)     1,020 (30%)

Equivalent units of production                   12,960             10,920

Costs of production:                   Materials  Conversion

Beginning work in process           $14,400      $6,500

Costs added during the month    173,500    243,500

Total costs of production           $187,900  $250,000

Cost per equivalent unit:             Materials  Conversion

Total costs of production            $187,900  $250,000

Equivalent units of production       12,960        10,920

Cost per equivalent unit               $14.50       $22.89

7 0
3 years ago
Last year vaughn corp. had sales of $315,000 and a net income of $17,832, and its year-end assets were $210,000. the firm's tota
KATRIN_1 [288]
I have the same question if anyone can help please let me know
4 0
3 years ago
You invested $1,200 in a mutual fund. Your account now has a value of $1,333. Your gain was:
AleksAgata [21]
$1,333 - $1,200 = $133
Your gain was: $133
7 0
3 years ago
Martin Jackson receives an hourly wage rate of $20, with time-and-a-half pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours during a
labwork [276]

Answer:Payroll data for the current week are as follows: hours worked, 46; federal income tax withheld, $350; social security tax rate, 6.0%; and Medicare tax rate, 1.5%.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
5. Calculating tax incidence Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge cola consumers a tax. Before the tax, 40 billion
vazorg [7]

Answer:

The amount of tax on a case of Cola is ;

= Selling price - Producer gain

= 6 - 2

= $4

The burden that falls on consumers is;

= Current selling price - Previous selling price

= 6 - 5

= $1

The burden that falls on the producers is;

= Selling price less consumer tax - Producer gain

= 5 - 2

= $3

The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers. <u>FALSE. </u>

Whether the tax is on the producer or on the consumer makes no difference because the quantity sold will be the same. The statement is therefore false.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You have been pricing an MP3 player in several stores. Three stores have the identical price of $300. Each store charges 24 perc
    13·1 answer
  • A firm produces output using capital and labor. The​ firm's marginal product of labor ​(MP Subscript Upper L​) is 40 and its mar
    15·1 answer
  • Determine the missing amount for each of the following:
    15·1 answer
  • A local government awards a landscaping company a contract worth $1.5 million per year for five years for maintaining public par
    7·1 answer
  • Marketing is non-paid promotional communication presented by the media True False
    9·1 answer
  • On December 1, Flint Electronics has three DVD players left in stock. All are identical, all are priced to sell at $77. One of t
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following are properties of a savings account? Select all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Disadvantage of multiple chain store?​
    14·1 answer
  • giannis corporation purchases debt investments as trading securities at a cost of $150,000 on december 1. this is its first and
    15·1 answer
  • Green design, sustainable packaging, waste management, and energy efficiency are aspects of the _________
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!