Answer:
A) TRUE
Explanation:
Updating marketing skills is not unrelated to modern demands in a global environment influenced by technological disruption. The need to keep abreast of changes in digital marketing for instance is essential if you have to stay relevant in the world of marketing.
Answer:
Television commercials are a source of ideas for dramatizations.
Explanation:
Marketing can be defined as the process of developing promotional techniques and sales strategies by a firm, so as to enhance the availability of goods and services to meet the needs of the end users or consumers through advertising and market research.
Basically, marketing comprises of all the activities such as, identifying, anticipating set of medium and processes for creating, promoting, delivering, and exchanging goods and services that has value for customers. It typically, involves understanding customer needs, building and maintaining healthy relationships with them in order to scale up your business.
A sales presentation can be defined as series of talk given by a salesperson with the attempt to persuade someone or a potential customer to buy a particular product, by giving information it. Some salespersons resort to the use of dramatics so as to initiate and close the sale of a particular product by engaging in series of theatrical actions.
Hence, the statement about using dramatics in a sales presentation which is most likely true is that, television commercials are a source of ideas for dramatizations because various actions are performed with the intent to promote the purchase of a product.
the awnser to the problem is true.
Answer:
The answer is "$32,000"
Explanation:
Coverdell mutual funds must be paid until the beneficiaries are 18 years old. The 16-year-old would be only eligible for two-year contributions (aged 16 and 17). The 14- year old is eligible for the four years' payment (age 14, 15, 16, 17). In five years, it would therefore be a total of $32,000 in the following:
Total 
Answer: charge a monopoly price
Explanation:
Patents provide an exclusive right to the firm in the production and sale of a drug. This provides the firm exclusive market power to decide the price and the quantity and therefore the firm is able to charge a monopoly price and also earn monopoly profits.
When an existing patent expires and the generic producers enter the market, the price reduces due to an increase in the supply of the erstwhile patented drug. This will reduce the monopoly profit of incumbent producers. Therefore, they will seek to deter the entry of generic drug makers in order to safeguard their monopoly profits and price.
Therefore, incumbents were willing to give enough to potential entrants so as to make them delay entry to charge a monopoly price.
The effect of the 2013 Supreme Court decision allowing legal action against these companies is increase in the cost of pay-for-delay agreements and also reduce incumbent profits from these agreements.
