The answer is: " <span>Otto Kernberg " .
______________________________________________________
"</span><span>Borderline personality disorder, in which some behavior "borders"
on being out of touch with reality, was first associated with the ideas of </span>
<u> Otto Kernberg </u>."
______________________________________________________
Waxing gibbous moon.
hope this helps!
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
The type of view which states that development is the result of an ongoing, bidirectional interchange between heredity and the environment is:
<h3>What is Epigenetic View?</h3>
This refers to the school of thought which believes that for an individual to develop, then he needs to have interactional exchange between nature and nurture.
With this in mind, we can state that it is the epigenetic view which the question is talking about because of the interaction between the environment and heredity for development to occur.
Read more development here:
brainly.com/question/11352260
Explanation:
Accreditation is important because it:
Helps determine if an institution meets or exceeds minimum quality standards. Helps students determine acceptable institutions for enrollment. Assists institutions in determining acceptability of transfer credits. Read more about the transfer of credits.
