It might be d but i’m not sure
For part A: two transformations will be used. First we will translate ABCD down 3 units: or the notation version for all (x,y) → (x, y - 3) so our new coordinates of ABCD will be:
A(-4,1)
B(-2,-1)
C(-2,-4)
D(-4,-2)
The second transformation will be to reflect across the 'y' axis. Or, the specific notation would be: for all (x,y) → (-x, y) New coordinates for A'B'C'D'
A'(4,1)
B'(2,-1)
C'(2,-4)
D'(4,-2)
Part B: The two figures are congruent.. We can see this a couple of different ways.
- first after performing the two transformations above, you will see that the original figure perfectly fits on top of the image.. exactly the same shape and size.
- alternatively, you can see that the original and image are both parallelograms with the same dimensions.
is this the full question?
The Taylor series is defined by:

Let a = 0.
Then its just a matter of finding derivatives and determining how many terms is needed for the series.
Derivatives can be found using product rule:

Do this successively to n = 6.

Plug in x=0 and sub into taylor series:

If more terms are needed simply continue the recursive derivative formula and add to taylor series.
Answer: 33.5
Step-by-step explanation: this question is on brainly lol but nobody explained it
1865 - 1240 = 625
Divide 625 by 1865 (626 goes first)
The answer is 0.335 move the decimal 2x forward
33.5