1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denis-greek [22]
3 years ago
14

W

Business
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a).

  • Labor hours productivity=3.500
  • Multi-factor productivity=2.423

b). The reduction in labor hours per employee per week to achieve this goal=15.735 hours

c). The maximum value that the overhead costs per week can be to ensure the multi-factor productivity is at least 1.257=$21,059.666

Explanation:

a).

  • <em>Step 1: Determine the labor hours productivity</em>

Labor output per week=potential leads×fee

where;

potential leads=5% of potential leads, and potential leads=3,000

potential leads=5%×3,000

potential leads=(5/100)×3,000=150

one-time fee=$70

replacing;

Labor output per week=70×150=$10,500

Labor input per week=cost per hour per employee×number of employees×number of hours worked

where;

cost per hour per employee=$25

number of employees=3

number of hours worked=40

replacing;

Labor input per week=25×3×40=$3,000

Labor hours productivity=labor output per week/labor input per week

Labor hours productivity=10,500/3,000=3.500

  • <em>Step 2: Determine the multi-factor productivity</em>

Multi-factor productivity=Generated fees/(labor cost+material cost+overhead cost)

where;

generated fees=number of employees×potential leads×potential ratio×fee

number of employees=3, potential leads=3,000, potential ratio=5%=5/100=0.05, fee=$70

generated fees=3×3,000×0.05×70=$31,500

Labor cost=$3,000

Material cost=$1,000

Overhead cost=$9,000

Total cost=3,000+1,000+9,000=$13,000

replacing;

Multi-factor productivity=31,500/13,000=2.423

b). Increasing the multi-factor productivity (MP) by 10%

New MP=(110/100)×2.423=2.665

New MP=generated fees/labor cost+material cost+overhead cost

labor cost=cost per hour per employee×number of employees×number of hours worked

where;

cost per hour per employee=$25

number of employees=3

number of hours worked=h

labor cost=25×3×h=75 h

material cost=$1,000

overhead cost=$9,000

generated fees=$31,500

New MP=2.665

replacing;

2.665=31,500/{(75 h)+(1,000)+(9,000)}

2.665=31,500/75 h+10,000

2.665(75 h+10,000)=31,500

199.875 h+26,650=31,500

199.875 h=31,500-26,650

199.875 h=4,850

h=4,850/199.875

h=24.265

New labor hours=24.265 hours per week

Initial labor hours=40 hours per week

Reduction in labor hours=Initial labor hours-new labor hours

Reduction in labor hours=(40-24.265)=15.735

The reduction in labor hours per employee per week to achieve this goal=15.735 hours

c). Using a multi-factor of 1.257

MP=generated fees/labor cost+material cost+overhead cost

where;

MP=1.257

generated fees=$31,500

Labor cost=$3,000

Material cost=$1,000

Overhead cost=c

replacing;

1.257=31,500/(c+3,000+1,000)

1.257=31,500/c+4,000

1.257(c+4,000)=31,500

1.257 c+5,028=31,500

1.257 c=31,500-5,028

1.257 c=26,472

c=26,472/1.257=21,059.666

The maximum value that the overhead costs per week can be to ensure the multi-factor productivity is at least 1.257=$21,059.666

You might be interested in
While discussing approaches to boost organization productivity, rene, the president of an auto manufacturer, was interested in a
Lesechka [4]
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question so I had to look for it. Anyway, the answer that would best complete the given statement above is the word CLASSICAL. <span>While discussing approaches to boost organization productivity, rene, the president of an auto manufacturer, was interested in a rational approach that through the application of scientific methods, time and motion studies, and job specialization found it is possible to increase productivity. This is the essence of the CLASSICAL viewpoint. Hope this helps.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
On December 31, 2020, Berclair Inc. had 300 million shares of common stock and 8 million shares of 9%, $100 par value cumulative
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer: $1.21

Explanation:

Earnings per share = (Net income - Preferred dividends) / Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:

Opening = 300 million shares

Treasury stock on March 1 = 54 million * (10 / 12 months) = 45 million shares

Share balance = 300 - 45  = 255 million shares

Dividend to be added = 255 * ( 1 + 5%) = 267.75 shares

Add Treasury stock sold = 267.75 + (9 million * 3/12 months)

= 270 million shares

Earnings per share = (400 - (8 * 9% * 100) ) / 270

= $1.21

4 0
3 years ago
Discuss the importance of understanding unique characteristics of an organization and selecting the right blueprints, frameworks
FromTheMoon [43]

Explanation:

This task of understanding the unique characteristics of an organization and selecting the effective models and structures to meet its unique needs, can be addressed through management planning. This is a type of planning that can be understood in the micro context of the organization, this is understood as the implementation of what was defined in strategic planning, through management planning are defined what are the essential resources that will help the company to achieve its goals. objectives and missions.

It integrates what needs to be done, by whom, when and at what cost.

3 0
3 years ago
Stock prices start to rise:
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

b.when the unemployment rate begins to decline following a recession.

Explanation:

In a recession there is usually a general decline in economic activities and a resultant decrease in spending. When recession occurs people will have less money to spend on buying stock so prices will fall s a result of reduced demand.

If however the economy is coming out of recession, economic activities are picking up, and unemployment begins to decline. This will lead to greater economic wealth, people will have more money to spend and demand for shares will rise. This will in turn lead to rise in price of shares.

5 0
4 years ago
Risk pooling is a strategy that attempts to use fewer warehouses to decrease the required safety stock levels since the negative
shepuryov [24]

Answer: (A) True

Explanation:

    Yes, the given statement is true that the risk pooling is one of the type of strategy which basically helps in explaining about the demand variability and also decrease the aggregate demand variance in the market.

 The main objective of the risk pooling is to maintain the inventory stock level and also avoiding the out of stock situation in the management.

By using the risk pooling strategy the various types of warehouse and companies are reduce the level of safety stock in the supply chain management and also transferring their risk to another organization such as insurance company.

 Therefore, the given statement is true.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Good marketing managers know that
    14·1 answer
  • Profits earned by a company that have not been paid to stockholders are called:_______.
    15·1 answer
  • Michigan Mattress Company is considering the purchase of land and the construction of a new plant. The land, which would be boug
    8·1 answer
  • How are laws different from ethics
    13·2 answers
  • Add me (free points) :) have a good day :)
    9·2 answers
  • During Year 1, Ramona Department Store had total sales of $3,000,000, of which 80% were on credit. The beginning balance in Acco
    8·1 answer
  • There are 300 purely competitive farms in the local dairy market. of the 300 dairy farms, 298 have a cost structure that generat
    8·1 answer
  • Callahan Company uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. The Packaging Department started the month with
    9·1 answer
  • A Japanese investor can earn a 1 percent annual interest rate in Japan or about 4.1 percent per year in the United States. If th
    7·1 answer
  • In the formula Y = a + bX, X represents the estimated Blank______. Multiple choice question. total amount of the allocation base
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!