Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The correct answer is I, II, III, and IV
The reason behind is that joint cost is always related to the multifarious products. Joint expense is the assembling cost brought about on a joint creation process which takes regular sources of info however at the same time delivers various items called joint-items, for example, preparing of raw petroleum at the same time yields gas, diesel, stream fuel, greases and different items.
So, as to apportion expenses to such joint items, bookkeepers need to utilize an appropriate cost portion technique on a predictable premise. The joint cost alludes to that cost which is brought about before the split-off point on the creation or assembling of numerous items, by expending similar data sources or factors of creation.
Answer:
The number of shares that Brick should use to calculate 2015 diluted earnings per share are 202,000 shares
Explanation:
The computation of the number of shares are shown below:
= January 1 shares + may 1 shares + convertible cumulative preferred stock
= 170,000 shares × 4 months ÷ 12 months + 200,000 shares × 8 months ÷ 12 months + 12,000 shares
= $56666.67 + $133,333.33 + $12,000
= $202,000 shares
The 4 months are calculated from January 1 to May 1, 2015
And, the 8 months are calculated from May 1 to December 31
Answer:
D- All of the above
Explanation:
Edg. 2021, took the test and got 100 percent
Answer:
d. the Circular Flow Model
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this statement is an example of the Circular Flow Model. This model (like mentioned in the question) illustrates the flow of cash from different people or company's in different industries. Where one person/company pays another, which takes it in as income and uses that to pay another company for what they need and so on.
