Answer: market economy’s do not have government interference in businesses
Explanation:
It would not fall at all. Monopolists own the entire industry meaning the consumers have no alternatives. If they have no alternative they have no choice but to buy even if the price increases
The industry's progress was confronted with a tough attitude of trade unions which had taken strength after the war.
The strategy adopted was the struggle for wage increases and the conservation of a monopoly power, which in many cases affected the introduction of technical improvements.
At that time, international sectoral trade unions and multinational corporations negotiate international framework agreements that allowed for Labour advancement.
It should also be noted that from the creation of the International Workers Association (IWA), the First World Trade union centre of the working class, the right to strike is recognised as one of the fundamental rights of the individual.Since then, representatives of workers from different countries jointly deal with the social problems that concerned them.
False a business can have lots of opportunities, look at Walgreen's. <span />
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
