Answer:
be honest with stuffs
pay enough attention to every thing and everyone
Answer:
$1,155.83
Explanation:
The computation of dirty price of this bond is shown below:-
Clean Price = $1,140
Face Value = $1,000
Interest = 3.80%
Interest for 5 month = Face Value × Interest × Time
$1,000 × 3.8% × 5 ÷ 12
$15.83
Dirty Price = Clean Price + Accrued Interest
= $1,140 + $15.83
= $1,155.83
Therefore for computing the dirty price of bond we simply add clean price with accrued interest.
<u>Full question:</u>
Locational cost-profit-volume analysis assumes:
(I) nonlinear variable costs.
(II) fixed costs that are constant over the range of possible output.
(III accurate estimates regarding the required level of output.
(IV) multiple products.
A. I, III, and IV only
B. II and III only
C. I, II, and III only
D. II, III, and IV only
E. I, II, III, and IV
<u>Answer:</u>
II and III only are the assumptions of locational cost-profit-volume analysis.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A process of defining the number of production where a company splits still with costs and profits is the locational cost-profit-volume analysis. This system needs into account both variable and fixed determinants that impact the overall creation values.
CPV practices a linear formula that acknowledges total costs similar to fixed costs plus variable costs. In CPV commentary, one of the numerous significant defining features of variable costs is that they vary based on variations in the amount of production.
Answer:
The two are part of a larger group of international trade rules known as Incoterms. These global guidelines for traders were devised by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), with the first version published in 1936. Each term refers to an agreement governing the responsibilities of shipping that fall respectively to buyers and sellers in an international trade transaction. This system of agreements aids in an orderly process of international trade by making contract models available that are easy to identify and understand in all languages.
Answer:
Likely not. There is no indication that Bill Smith had the authority or capacity to sign on the corporation's behalf.
Explanation:
Since in the situation it is mentioned that there is no corporate seal on the deed neither it is to be said so this is not a valid real estate transaction as there is no signal that bill smith have an authority or the capacity for signing on the behalf of the corporation
So the above statement represent an answer