1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sladkih [1.3K]
2 years ago
9

What will/should Trump advise the country in his Farewell Address

Social Studies
1 answer:
Serhud [2]2 years ago
3 0

In his Farewell Address, Trump should talk about the successes of the country, especially under his leadership, and how even though some things did not work out, the country in total is better. He should go out with a bang, make some jokes, but overall say farewell. He will most likely address the wall (and if he has built it) and how it helped/ didn't.) He should tell the country how they can continue helping after he has left the presidency, and encourage people to vote.

You might be interested in
How does financial status impacts marital stability.<br><br>​
Whitepunk [10]

Financial status impacts marital stability in many different ways. If a married couple struggles with financial worries there would be be blaming, worrying and shame in the family that can lead to many arguments. ... The couple may feel tense and the tension may even contribute to the break up of the marriage.

Financial matters affect not only financial satisfaction, but also marital satisfaction and quality of life. With the potential to influence so many aspects of everyday life, continued research in understanding the processes involved in this fundamental area of family studies is vital. Satisfaction with one's financial status can enhance marital satisfaction, and more broadly, life satisfaction. Conversely, financial difficulties and dissatisfaction with one's financial status can lead to marital conflict and divorce.

7 0
3 years ago
(09.01 LC)<br> Ptolemy may not be considered a traditional 'scientist' today.<br> True<br> False
tigry1 [53]
I am pretty sure it is true
3 0
2 years ago
During the fifth century BC, Athens and Sparta were arguably the two most powerful Greek poleis (city-states). But while few pri
natima [27]

Answer:

A merchant who is an Athenian citizen

Explanation:

In the ancient Greece, commerce is considered as the major income sources. Both the tradesmen and the merchants were indulged in doing commercial activities. "Merchant" is a term which is referred to the skilled businessmen or the craftsmen who is in control of the general business and therefore, they are called as the traders. Traders includes jewelers, sculptors, painters, architects, stonemasons, bakers and many more.

The ancient Athens city was very beautiful and well maintained city. It is highly developed and civilized. Business and commerce is the main source of income during those in Athens city.

In ancient Greece, children of the merchants played with toys made of mud and clays, learned with private tutors nut in modern days, the children of the merchants went abroad to get good quality education.  In the modern days, only the businesses that have been operating with free men.

3 0
3 years ago
What did Slave owning states believe about state's rights?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Rallying Cry of Secession

The appeal to state's rights is of the most potent symbols of the American Civil War, but confusion abounds as to the historical and present meaning of this federalist principle.

The concept of states' rights had been an old idea by 1860. The original thirteen colonies in America in the 1700s, separated from the mother country in Europe by a vast ocean, were use to making many of their own decisions and ignoring quite a few of the rules imposed on them from abroad. During the American Revolution, the founding fathers were forced to compromise with the states to ensure ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a united country. In fact, the original Constitution banned slavery, but Virginia would not accept it; and Massachusetts would not ratify the document without a Bill of Rights.

Secession Speeches

South Carolinians crowd into the streets of Charleston in 1860 to hear speeches promoting secession.

The debate over which powers rightly belonged to the states and which to the Federal Government became heated again in the 1820s and 1830s fueled by the divisive issue of whether slavery would be allowed in the new territories forming as the nation expanded westward.

The Missouri Compromise in 1820 tried to solve the problem but succeeded only temporarily. (It established lands west of the Mississippi and below latitude 36º30' as slave and north of the line—except Missouri—as free.) Abolitionist groups sprang up in the North, making Southerners feel that their way of life was under attack. A violent slave revolt in 1831 in Virginia, Nat Turner’s Rebellion, forced the South to close ranks against criticism out of fear for their lives. They began to argue that slavery was not only necessary, but in fact, it was a positive good.

As the North and the South became more and more different, their goals and desires also separated. Arguments over national policy grew even fiercer. The North’s economic progress as the Southern economy began to stall fueled the fires of resentment. By the 1840s and 1850s, North and South had each evolved extreme positions that had as much to do with serving their own political interests as with the morality of slavery.

As long as there were an equal number of slave-holding states in the South as non-slave-holding states in the North, the two regions had even representation in the Senate and neither could dictate to the other. However, each new territory that applied for statehood threatened to upset this balance of power. Southerners consistently argued for states rights and a weak federal government but it was not until the 1850s that they raised the issue of secession. Southerners argued that, having ratified the Constitution and having agreed to join the new nation in the late 1780s, they retained the power to cancel the agreement and they threatened to do just that unless, as South Carolinian John C. Calhoun put it, the Senate passed a constitutional amendment to give back to the South “the power she possessed of protecting herself before the equilibrium of the two sections was destroyed.”

Controversial—but peaceful—attempts at a solution included legal compromises, arguments, and debates such as the Wilmot Proviso in 1846, Senator Lewis Cass’ idea of popular sovereignty in the late 1840s, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854, and the Lincoln-Douglas Debates in 1858. However well-meaning, Southerners felt that the laws favored the Northern economy and were designed to slowly stifle the South out of existence. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was one of the only pieces of legislation clearly in favor of the South. It meant that Northerners in free states were obligated, regardless of their feelings towards slavery, to turn escaped slaves who had made it North back over to their Southern masters. Northerners strongly resented the law and it was one of the inspirations for the publishing of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852.

6 0
3 years ago
People have a constitutional right to voice opinion freely and without fear in (a) ________.
hjlf

Constitution provides rights to the citizen. "People have a constitutional right to voice their opinion freely and without fear would be possible in​ a <u>democracy</u>." Thus, option E is correct.

<h3>What is democracy?</h3>

Democracy has been the governmental form that allows the citizens to choose the authority or the government by the method of voting. It has elected representatives to support the people.

It allows freedom and provides rights to the citizens as it is derived from the power of people and their will. It involves the power and benefits of the people directly or indirectly.

Therefore, option E. <u>democracy</u> allows the citizens to voice their opinions freely.

Learn more about democracy, here:

brainly.com/question/17627950

#SPJ1

Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was, People have a constitutional right to voice opinion freely and without fear would be possible in​ (a) ________.

A. totalitarianism

B. socialism

C. communism

D. secular totalitarianism

E. democracy

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Putting on makeup while driving is highly encouraged. <br> a. True <br> b. False
    12·1 answer
  • The __________ principle is that, in a democracy, policies should reflect the will of more than half of the voters.
    8·1 answer
  • The looking-glass self may not be an accurate reflection of how others view us
    6·1 answer
  • What people built to ensure commercial farms could be used mostly for the war effort
    14·1 answer
  • "I wish you wouldn’t open that window. It lets the pollen in and makes my allergies worse." This is
    13·1 answer
  • Why is gong to a historic school important
    10·2 answers
  • Which is NOT a basic economic question? Group of answer choices
    8·1 answer
  • PLS HELP!!!! i need to summarize this ples help me qwq
    5·2 answers
  • Give me 3 reasons why a chicken would NOT be a good choice for modern currency (use the 6 characteristics)
    5·1 answer
  • What is a plae bargain?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!