Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
3x - 4 =9
Step-by-step explanation:
divide the entire equation by 3
9x/3 - 12/3 = 36/3
3x - 4 = 9
Answer:
9/80
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
19.488
Step-by-step explanation:
8.12 x 2.4 = 19.488
<em>*To solve an inequality, it's the same as solving an equation; isolate the variable to one side.</em>
For this, all you need to do is divide both sides by -4. And since we are dividing by a <u>negative</u>, flip the inequality sign and your inequality is 
Now to graph this. Since x can be "equal to" 1/4 ( ≤ = less than or equal to), you will have a <u>closed circle on 1/4.</u> And since x can also be "less than" 1/4, <u>the arrow will be going to the left of 1/4.</u>