You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
The answer is 12/100. This is because the 12 is a 100 decimal place.
=
Multiply both sides by v
<span>
= w Multiply both sides by x
</span>kv = wx Divide both sides by w
<span>
= x Switch the sides to make it easier to read
</span>
x = <span>
</span>
We are asked to identify an another way to solve the given problem or this summation 104 + 34 + 228 + 887. We can verify it by doing of performing the summation in a reverse sequence such 877 comes first, then followed by 228, then followed by 34 and lastly added by 104. Therefore, the answer is 877 + 228 + 34 + 104.This is an another way to solve the given problem.
