I believe the answer is: They are based on the arbitrary borders of old European empires
African continent was colonized by different european empire. To avoid conflicts among the european, they divided africa into several territories and dtermine which country has the jurisdiction over each territories. After African nations gained independence, they still use this separation as borders to differentiate one country with another.
If the Federal Government were able to regulate commerce within a state, there would possibly be a <u>clash of interests</u>.
<h3>
Trade within a
State</h3>
The United States was formed in such a way that there was an internal state government and a federal government that could implement general policies of common application.
Since the federal government has a different view of trade than the state does, an inclusion of the federal government would cause a <u>clash of interests</u> due to the different views among them.
If you want to learn more about Federal Government, you can visit the following link: brainly.com/question/371257
Man lemme tell u a story bout when i was in the 3rd grade.. there was this kid that nobody liked and everybody bullied him and he'd eat his boogers when he thought he was alone and i went up to him at recess and he was a nice kid and now we friends. have a good day.
Slaves standing up and trying to fight for their freedom.
Answer:
The geographical location of New York makes it easier to be a natural link from New England to states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, or Michigan because it is in the center of the two regions. There is also no mountains in the route from New England to the states across.
