A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
It was also the to you think I have no money to help me out I was the to you think
I think it's D I don't know if it's correct
The answer is He led the U.S through the Civil War
That statement is false
rather than emphasizing on reliance on saving power of amida, Zen Buddhism tend to Emphasizes on rigorous discipline and continuous effort to achieve and maintain personal development.<span />
