The law of moral cause-and-effect is called the law of Karma.
Depending on whoever you ask, there are several opinions on what karma really is. While some adhere to the traditional interpretation rooted in Eastern religions, others interpret it more in line with a Western conception of good and evil. This can consequently result in various interpretations of how karma functions in life. This law states that whatever ideas or energy one put out, one receives back, whether it's positive or negative. One must embody and merit the things they want in order to obtain them. It's the idea that you harvest what one sows. Memories and wants are shaped by karma, which then dictates how one lives. The karmic software that controls one's existence is comprised of actions, memories, and desires.
To learn more about the Law of Karma refer to:
brainly.com/question/18175497
#SPJ1
Had a more moderate, agriculturally productive climate in the past than today, especially in Mesopotamia and the Nile valley
Citation: https://www.britannica.com/place/Fertile-Crescent
Answer:
It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles
Explanation:
it is nobler to die with integrity then to live with principles that harm other strongly support the statement that men with integrity does not compromise with his principles he is self made person and he believes in his abilities and work on his own principles on the other side a man who compromises on his principles usually lacks confidence and is not capable enough to believe on his own abilities and is not able to make decisions on his own on the other side a man with integrity confidence is capable enough to even handle difficult of situation and can manage every problem very well as this phrase is mostly quoted in most of the texts
REBECCA NURSE a famous religious author also quoted as same that "It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles that harm others" being a religious and follower of GOD she came on to the conclusion that in living with integrity is that what matters
Answer:
John Foster Dulles was an international lawyer and US Secretary of State and was known for his strong stance against communism all over the world.
The major factor was false instinct of threat.He concluded there was a threat where there was none. If we had removed the troops immediately at the end of World War I , the so called threat would have disappeared.
The US and Britain formed an alliance and attacked Russia towards the end of World War I .They thought the revolutionary Bolsheviks would be too disorganized to accomplish a successful military regime and Russia could be split between them.