Answer: Co-actor
Explanation:
Co-actor, in terms of social facilitation is the person who performs the same activity or action along with the performer.This mechanism is not performed in competitive manner.Performers tends to improve his performance while in presence of audience and co-actor.
According to the question,the guy is known as co-actor in terms of social facilitation as he is performing the same act of sitting along with the person.Thus,this impacts behavior of person as a performer.
The answer would be : Margaret Thatcher
United States and the Great Britain are the two major power in the world for the liberalism system. In a conference Reagan directly stated that "Defeating the Soviet Union was a team effort, and Margaret Thatcher was a key player"<span />
Answer:
Projection defense mechanism
Explanation:
The defense mechanism is used by Sigmund Freud and his daughter Anna Freud. These are psychological terms. Projection is one of them. Projection is a defense mechanism that is used by people. This defense mechanism was given by Anna Freud.
In the projection defense mechanism, people attributed their unwanted thought, feelings behavior on another person.
Thought are the main resources that are projected by a person on to another person.
For instance, if someone hates another person his superego not accepted it. It is against the norms. A person starts to believe that the other person hates me.
Thus here Gabrielle used projection to show her feelings
Answer:
Lighting significantly affects performance
Explanation:
In this study, Ellen took two groups and applied the same IQ test to both of them. The only variable that changed between the groups was the level of lighting in the room. The first group was placed in a room with very bright lights and the second group was placed in a room with more normal lighting.
Individuals in the first group did better in the IQ test and she found that the difference between the two scores was statistically significant.
We say that a result is <u>"statistically significant" when it is not likely to occur randomly but rather is likely to be attributable to a specific cause.</u>
<u />
So we can say that <u>the better performance in the first group tests were not likely to occur randomly but it can be attributable to a specific cause. </u>
<u></u>
<u>Since the only variable that was different between the groups was the lightning, we can conclude that lighting significantly affects performance. </u>
