1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sauron [17]
3 years ago
7

A new order of demonstrated political loyalties, such as seen in Texas and the South from Reconstruction until the middle 20th c

entury with the movement from a Democratic majority identification to a development of parity between the Democratic and then in the latter half of the 20th century the shift to Republican party majority identification is called________.A) dealignment.B) realignment.C) alignment.D) political epoch.E) party shift.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C) alignment.

Explanation:

Alignment of party is the situation whereby a given country tends to swing the loyalty to a party as a result of the aims and objectives of the party aligning with what the wanted.

This goes ahead to show that the States shifts their loyalty from one party to another with no absolute loyalty to a singel party as demonstrated in Texas and the South in the 20th century.

You might be interested in
How many different things did Leonardo da Vinci invent?
timurjin [86]
Parachute,diving suit,
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A large new diamond mine has just opened, and the price of diamonds has gone down. Because she has studied economic, Cecilia dec
S_A_V [24]

She knows that the price of the diamond is down. But it will not stay down forever. Soon the supply will be reduced and the prices will go up. That’s when she will sell her necklace. And gain profit

4 0
3 years ago
After battle of Lexington and concord who was president
Lyrx [107]
Abraham Lincoln was the president
5 0
3 years ago
What would have happened if prithviraj killed ghori in the first battle of terrain explain by describing the reasons of the vict
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.

Explanation:

Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.

8 0
3 years ago
Witch tip provides the best support in writing a first draft?
Darina [25.2K]
It’s either A or D..I’ll say A ?
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where were the english forced to house a large number of prisoners in the late eighteenth century?
    10·1 answer
  • True or false:Debating bills on the Congress floor is part of the law making process
    12·1 answer
  • The process by which a society chooses its leaders
    15·1 answer
  • Why is Saudi Arabia a leading participant in OPEC?
    6·1 answer
  • "A child with partial- and full-thickness burns is admitted to the pediatric unit. What should be the priority at this time?"
    12·1 answer
  • What marks the southernmost border of Mesopotamia​ *Help*
    8·1 answer
  • List the three guiding principles of India’s foreign policy.
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT I WILL GIVE YOU BRAIN THING IF ITS CORRECT!
    15·1 answer
  • Write five solution of energy crisis of nepal​
    5·1 answer
  • (for social studies)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!