Answer:
- The way they choose their homes were different.
- Their main food sources are different.
Explanation:
- The way they choose their homes were different.
During the stone age, humans were nomadic. In order to fulfill their basic needs they have to engaged in hunting & gathering process to obtain foods and shelter from their environment. If the food in a certain area became too scarce, they will move and settle to another area.
During the agricultural age on the other hand, humans stayed in one place in a long period of time because they can produce their own food source. They're no longer need to hunt to fulfill their basic needs.
- Their main food sources are different.
During the stone age, animals meat and wild fruits were humans' main food source. As we entered the agricultural age, we started to developed food sources that were easy to produced and provide us with high calories. This is when we slowly transitioned into mostly consuming crops such as Potatoes, rice, and corn.
Answer: D or C both works
The answer to this question is Seriation.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
There is no specific handout, or master technique neither is there any curriculum for it whatsoever. Happiness, self-confidence and positive esteem can be the byproducts of other things, but they can’t really be any sort of goals unto themselves.
That the 'realistic aim than happiness' principle in raising kids was effective in senior state doeasn't mean make it a universal accepted one.
Answer:
c. The suspect was in the room where the victim was found because of the matching carpet fibers.
Explanation:
Locard's exchange principle states that the perpetrator of a crime will leave with something from a crime scene or bring something into the crime scene. These will be used as evidence to get the perpetrator.
From this question, option A is incorrect because the bullets on the victim did not match with the pistol of the suspect, hence Locards principle does not apply.
Option B is also incorrect because the car could have been driven there by someone else or could have just been parked there.
Option D is also incorrect because though the presence of similar fibre carpets on the victims appartment and on the suspect indicate the suspect was in the apartment, does not necessarily mean he commited the crime, he may have been there days earlier or he may have been there that day for other reasons.
Option C fits better.
