1. Since it's m - 7 you would have 7 to both sides so you would in fact have m < 13. If you double check your answer, you see that if m is say 12 (because 12 is obviously less than 13), 12 - 7 < 6
2. Again, use the same process on this problem as the first one. Add 8 to each sides because it's you're subtracting 8 from n. So you end up with n > 13. Check your answer. Say n is 14. 14 - 8 > 5
3. This one is different because you are adding 5 to p. So in order to get p by itself, you need to subtract 5 from both sides. p < 5. Say p is 4, 4 + 5 < 10.
When working with problems like these, you need to isolate the variable on one side and get it by itself.
Answer:
No, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’.
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The rule of the reflection across the line y=x is equal to
(x,y) -------> (y,x)
so
A(-6,6) -------> A'(6,-6) ----> is ok
B(-3,3) ------> B'(3,-3) ----> is ok
C(-8,2) ------> C'(8,-2) ----> is not ok ( is not a reflection acros the line y=x)
therefore
The triangles are no t congruent, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’
<h2><u>
Answer:</u></h2>
Jared and Pedro walked a total of <u>4.3 miles</u>
<h2><u>
Step-by-step explanation:</u></h2>
- The equation for distance is <u>speed = distance ÷ time.</u>
- Rearrange the equation to make distance the subject:
<em>(multiply both sides by time)</em>
<em> </em><u>Distance = Speed × Time</u>
- Convert your numbers into suitable units:
1 mile ÷ 15 = <u>0.06m/minute</u>
- Finally, substitute the numbers into the equation and solve:
Distance = 0.06 × 65 = <u>4.3miles</u> (rounded to the nearest decimal place)
<h2 />
Answer:
y= 2/5-1
Step-by-step explanation:
You get the 2/5 because you go 2 to the right and go 5 up, the -1 is because the x-int is at -1.
i dont think you have a whole question down and we need examples of the triangles so please shw examples
