Answer:
diagonal spread
Explanation:
Spread is basically a sale and purchase of a call. So here the the types of spreads determine the relationship between the strike price and the expiration dates of all options involved in the trade.
In this example investor has sold 1 ABC Jan 50 Call and has bought 1 ABC Apr 60 Call. This means he bought the option ABC with the longer expiration date and with a higher strike price and sold the option ABC with the near expiration date and the lower strike price. Here both the expiration and strike price are different. So this is an example of diagonal spread.
The option horizontal spread is incorrect because it is a spread that depicts the difference in expiration dates but strike price is the same. Here both the expiration and strike price are different.
The option straddle is incorrect because it is a spread in which both options have the same expiry date and same strike price. Here both the expiration and strike price are different.
The option dialogue spread is not a valid option too.
The option Combination is also suitable because this is an example of Combination and combinations include option spread trades such as vertical spreads, horizontal spreads, and diagonal spreads.
So the most suitable option is diagonal spread which is an example of Combination.
Your answer is:
It is too difficult to compete with major retailers like Target and Best Buy.
When a lot of people buy things from a store, there is a lot of turbulence in many stores, espeically in big retailers. The answer will be It is too difficult to compete with major retailers like Target and Best Buy.
Best of Luck!
Answer: Start = $300 million
End = $318.59 million
Explanation:
NAV can be calculated by dividing the funds Assets net of Liabilities by the total number of outstanding shares.
At start of the year NAV is $300 million and NAV per share is therefore,
= 300 million/ 10 million
= $30 per share.
Ending NAV
During the year the fund made Investments and increased by a price of 7%
= 300 million (1 + 0.07)
= $321 million
We still have to subtract the 12b-1 fees that the fund charges though and that would result in,
= 321 million * (1 - 0.0075)
= 318.5925
= $318.59 million.
Dividing this by the total number of outstanding shares we have,
= 318.59 /10
= $31.86
$31.86 is the NAV per share at year end.
Answer: When Wood Co. sells the land to a third party.
Explanation: As stated in the question, Wood Co. who purchased the land is a subsidiary of the seller, Power Corp., the parent company. In a consolidated financial statement whereby financial reports of all entities, subsidiaries and all financial attachment of a corporate establishment is accounted for.
Power Corp. owns the entirety of Woods Co. and therefore during a consolidated financial statement reporting, the profit made by Power Corp. from the sale of the land must be recorded when the land is purchased from Woods Co. by a third party.
Answer:
Explanation:
I think your question is missed of key information, allow me to attach the photo question below.
The quantity demanded is 30 units when the price is 60, we use the reconciliation method on the demand line.
