Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
I'm confused too I'm sorry
Answer:
Yup
Step-by-step explanation:
Nice!!!!
<h2>
Hello!</h2>
The answer is:
B.
<h2>
Why?</h2>
From the statement we know that the cheetah can reach a speed of 70 mph, but it can be maintained for no more than 1,640 feet.
The expression "no more than" means that at least it can be reached but never exceeded, it involves that the distance can be less or equal than 1,640 feet but never more than that.
So, the correct option is:
B.
Have a nice day!
This problem states that an overseas telephone call costs 0.36 cents per minute. They spend 6 minutes on the call.
All you have to do is multiply 0.36 cents on 6 minutes.
Your answer is $2.16
Hope this helped! :D