Answer:
Here is your answer.
Explanation:
After the collapse of the Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire expanded the influence of the Roman Empire by introducing similar themes of government, prioritization of construction, and emphasis on commerce in their system, but modified the cultural feelings of the Roman Empire into their own faiths.
President's ordinance power has decreased in the modern time in US.
Explanation:
The ordinance power of the President is the power to run the branch of the government in executive decisions, which includes giving orders in accordance with the law that is passed by the Congress.
This ordinance is given to the President and protected according to the constitution.
However as the country expanded and as the powers were reeled in after the Civil war, it was thought that his powers can be curbed in favor of more representation in legislature.
Jefferson allowed many Federalists to keep their government jobs, even though he disagreed with their policies. Because Jefferson supported the French Revolution, many Federalists feared he would bring revolutionary change to the United States.
Explanation:
He favored states rights over a strong central government. He supported the idea that states could nullify federal laws. Jefferson’s republican beliefs favored a largely rural populace with limited governmental interference. He, like many of the founding fathers, wanted a republican system in which power is shared by the states and federal government.
He believed that a strong federal government would get too powerful and take away the rights of the people. This caused fear in the federalists that he would change the policies of united states.
Certified Legal Assistant (“CLA”) or Certified Paralegal (“CP”) is a designation conferred upon those who pass a two-day comprehensive examination offered by the national association of legal assistants.
<h3>
What is a Certified Paralegal?</h3>
- The Certified Paralegal (CP) certification is essential for achieving success, respect, and opportunity in the legal profession.
- It is recognized as a national professional standard for paralegals.
- The American Bar Association has recognized this as a mark of distinction.
- The CP is recognized as the definitive paralegal certification by more than 47 paralegal organizations.
- Responsive to paralegal needs and to the fact that this type of self-regulation is required to strengthen and expand the development of this career field.
- A positive, ongoing, voluntary program that attests to and encourages high levels of achievement in the paralegal profession.
- NALA offers a two-day comprehensive exam that results in the designation of Certified Legal Assistant ("CLA") or Certified Paralegal ("CP").
Therefore, Certified Legal Assistant (“CLA”) or Certified Paralegal (“CP”) is a designation conferred upon those who pass a two-day comprehensive examination offered by the national association of legal assistants.
Know more about Certified Paralegal here:
brainly.com/question/23157938
#SPJ4
Explanation:
It’s hard to imagine a political institution less suited to a 21st-century liberal democracy than the Electoral College. It arose from a convoluted compromise hammered out late in the Constitutional Convention, and the rise of political parties in the late 18th century and the spread of democratic ideals in the early 19th quickly undermined its rationales. If it didn’t exist, no one today would consider creating it.
But the Electoral College is worse than merely useless. Its primary function is to malapportion political power, and it does so — indeed, has always done so — with strikingly awful consequences. A state is entitled to a number of electors equal to its number of senators and representatives. Before the Civil War, the combination of the Electoral College and the Three-Fifths Clause, counting a slave as three-fifths of a person, gave the Slave Power outsize control in electing the president, with the consequence that antebellum presidents were almost always either slaveholders or at least friendly to their interests (the major exceptions were both named Adams). After the war, every person counted as a full person for apportionment purposes — but with the collapse of Reconstruction and the violent disfranchisement of African-Americans throughout the South, that increase in representation once again redounded only to the benefit of white male power-holders, a situation that was not largely rectified until the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Because a state’s number of electors is based on total population, not actual voters, it gives the states no incentive to enfranchise new groups of people, or to make voting easier for those eligible. And because states want to maximize their influence in selecting the president, they also have a strong incentive to use a winner-take-all approach to awarding electors, which all but two states currently do. The result — as we’ve now seen twice in the last two decades — is that a popular vote loser can be an Electoral College winner.
In a liberal democracy, not everything need be decided by majority vote. But once something is put to a vote, it is hard to understand why the side getting fewer votes should win. And Americans have long understood themselves to be voting for their president, not for presidential electors. It is long past time to get rid of the Electoral College.
by jese wingman
