Answer:
internal; her dishonesty; fundamental attribution error
Explanation:
Fundamental attribution error: In psychology, the term fundamental attribution error is defined as an individual's propensity of overemphasizing the personal characteristics of another person whereas ignoring the situational factors while judging his or her behavior.
Example: If an individual experiences something bad due to another person then he or she would blame the personality or the behavior of that person rather than the situational factors.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the fundamental attribution error.
Answer:
(A) Urbanization makes it easier to proportion services like medical services and education because people are more concentrated in urban areas. Rural areas are hard to supply with specialized services. A disadvantage is that crime tends to be statistically higher in urban areas.
Explanation:
In addition to the advantages and disadvantages of urbanization (B) Two factors that have led to the urban sprawl is 1) lack of urban planning and 2) rapid population growth that leads to overcrowding and traffic problems that compel people to move elsewhere or to travel long distances and thus adding to the urban sprawl. (C) An economic disadvantage that cities may face is that services may be overburdened and it can lead to lower quality of life and higher poverty indicators in inner cities, for example. (D) Urban sprawl has a negative impact on the environment because more people use private transportation because they have to travel long distances, thus increasing pollution. It also increases the need for parking and thus increasing the price of parking and making a sustainable form of life difficult for most wage earners. (E) Two practices that would be emphasized to create sustainable cities would be to encourage the use of public transportation and non-motorized vehicles like bicycles to reduce pollution and the levels of car traffic in the city.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Answer:
They wanted people's rights to be protected.
Explanation:
Answer:
Melita is incorrect
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question we can say that the correct response would be that Melita is incorrect. This is because even though Melita paid less because food costs have gone down, it does not mean that all products have gone down in price. Therefore if other products have risen in price, then the purchasing power of the local currency would have decreased, and thus causing inflation.
