1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmasim [6.3K]
3 years ago
13

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde

n of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate? Explain your reasoning.
Law
1 answer:
mixer [17]3 years ago
6 0

I believe that defendants should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt to be convicted. Here's why.

There are a lot of false criminal accusations going around, where an innocent person gets charged with a large crime.

In these cases, there is no evidence, no witnesses, just 2 people sharing different stories, one of which is false. Yet, the defendant, who is telling the truth about being innocent, gets found guilty.

This happens more so in juvenile cases, due to the fact that there is no jury in juvenile courts.

Imagine a 12-13 year old getting charged with murder, and there is absolutely no proof whatsoever, but the judge finds them guilty, convicts them, and locks them up for 4 years. Imagine how that would affect their life.

Innocent people are suffering because they get convicted with no reasoning.

This is why I believe they need to  be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt before being convicted.

I hope this helps, and have a nice day!

You might be interested in
What makes fingerprints individual and unique? How do scientists match a fingerprint to a specific person?
densk [106]

Answer:

your finger prints are unique that means no one in the world have the same ridges and lines that you have on your fingers

Explanation:

as the fetus moves there fingers rubs against the womb these tiny forces pushed the skin as it grows

7 0
3 years ago
Assume that Big Drug Company (BDC) was one of ten drug manufacturers that produced and sold a drug in Ohio that was found to cau
n200080 [17]

Answer:

Market share liability

Explanation:

To understand the doctrine of market share liability, it is important to first know the meaning of market share itself.

Market share refers to the percentage of the overall sales of a particular industry that is generated by a company. It calculated by dividing the total sales of the firm during a specified period by the aggregate sales of the industry during the same period. This gives an idea what the size of a company is compared with its competitors in the industry.

From the question, market share of BDC for that drug i Ohio is believed to be 40% when the mother of the plaintiff was taking it.

Market share liability is a legal doctrine unique to the law of the U.S. which gives an opportunity to a plaintiff who sustained an injury from a fungible product to establish a prima facie case against the product based on the market share of the manufacturers of that product, regardless of whether or not knows the actual producer of the product.

Therefore, the state of the plaintiff follows the doctrine of market share liability if he is able to collect $40,000 which from BDC out of the $100,000.

Note:

The $40,000 is obtained after applying 40% market share of BDC to the $100,000 total damages.

I wish you the best.

8 0
3 years ago
Speed Component
eimsori [14]

Answer:

xnznsjiwiw has to be a little bit nc

4 0
2 years ago
Where does the National Government draw its power from?
Wittaler [7]
The National Government gains it's power through the constitution.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name 2 things that Courts of Appeals use to limit the time spent on any given case.
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

set forth the same time limits for civil appeals to a court of appeals

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kaileb was eating a deep-fried clam fritter at Flo's Crabshack in Rhode Island (it's a real place!), when a very small piece of
    9·1 answer
  • Under United States law, an element of a crime is one of a set of facts that must be what to convict a defendant of a crime
    9·1 answer
  • How could the Commerce Clause of the Constitution apply to medical marijuana? And why does the owner believe it does not apply t
    5·2 answers
  • Daniel objects to the work of a company that tests products on animals. He holds a meeting at his house to discuss a possible pr
    11·1 answer
  • Should government be allowed to decide what<br> fats are used in a restaurant?
    13·2 answers
  • How are other countries doing when it comes to female representation in the police force compared to the US?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case
    10·1 answer
  • Define proto<br>please help​
    15·2 answers
  • How did the pilgrims influence the framers of the constitution?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not considered a “victimless” crime against society?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!