1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
emmasim [6.3K]
3 years ago
13

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde

n of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate? Explain your reasoning.
Law
1 answer:
mixer [17]3 years ago
6 0

I believe that defendants should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt to be convicted. Here's why.

There are a lot of false criminal accusations going around, where an innocent person gets charged with a large crime.

In these cases, there is no evidence, no witnesses, just 2 people sharing different stories, one of which is false. Yet, the defendant, who is telling the truth about being innocent, gets found guilty.

This happens more so in juvenile cases, due to the fact that there is no jury in juvenile courts.

Imagine a 12-13 year old getting charged with murder, and there is absolutely no proof whatsoever, but the judge finds them guilty, convicts them, and locks them up for 4 years. Imagine how that would affect their life.

Innocent people are suffering because they get convicted with no reasoning.

This is why I believe they need to  be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt before being convicted.

I hope this helps, and have a nice day!

You might be interested in
According to the constitutional court what the value of African law<br><br>​
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms. Non-racialism and non-sexism. Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.

4 0
3 years ago
Approaches of democracy
Lelu [443]
I don’t quite understand your question, can you please go into further detail?
5 0
2 years ago
What would you do if you see someone robbing a house​
stepan [7]

Answer:

I would most definitely go and help the family of that house and call 911 as I head over so I would have a sort of back up just in case something went wrong.

Explanation:

I just have to stall the robber for time if I were to get hurt so the police can arrive although I could handle myself.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Rawls and Nozick both agree that : a)the law should embody no conception of the good life b)in the name of liberty the governmen
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice

Explanation:

Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.

They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.

According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.

Hence, the correct answer is d.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
if you or your friends decide to drink you should answer option plan ahead for a ride, be the one driving, ask your friends to d
raketka [301]

Answer:

Plan ahead for a ride

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Alcohol abuse is intentional overuse.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    10·1 answer
  • What kind of information would best help you answer the prompt? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Police officer placing sign outside a rail station that says 'Waiting Room for White Only.'
    11·2 answers
  • The life cycle of the
    8·1 answer
  • List three (3) occasions of sin and how to avoid temptation to sin in each occasion you listed.
    7·1 answer
  • Major scandals at enron, worldcom, and tyco led to the passage of which law in 2002?
    13·1 answer
  • Pick a case where police used deadly force and present the facts to the class. You may want to review the Continuum of Force Pyr
    6·1 answer
  • How do it get through to customer service number
    15·1 answer
  • Do you think it's a good idea for the federal government to regulate the information that is shared over social media based on t
    10·2 answers
  • Israeli authorities have a firm policy of refusing to negotiate or give in to terrorist demands T/F
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!