The principle of stare decisis, which involves precedent, obliges other courts to apply the law consistently in the same circumstances.
When a case involves the same or similar facts or the same legal issues, a judicial decision known as a precedent is used as a guide. At common law, courts must follow the precedents of other courts. Courts must follow certain precedents but not others.
Determining which decisions apply to a particular court can be difficult due to the complexity of the federal structure. Priority is usually based on several decisions. Sometimes a single decision can set a precedent. For example, a state supreme court's interpretation of an individual statute is usually considered part of the law at the outset.
Learn about precedents:
brainly.com/question/6196271
#SPJ4
Incomplete question. The remaining part of the question reads;
The city of Beautifica has established a lovely park in the city. The city council wishes to preserve some elements of nature, undisturbed by city noise, traffic, pollution, and crowding. The park is a place where citizens can go and find grass, trees, flowers, and quiet. In addition, there are playgrounds and picnic areas, and at one time a road ran through the park. Now the road is closed. The city council has enacted a law requiring that all entrances to the park have the following signposted: NO VEHICLES IN THE PARK.
<em>The law seems clear, but some disputes have arisen over its interpretation. Interpret the law in the following cases, keeping in mind what the law says (the letter of the law) as well as the legislative intent. Examine the situation and decide whether or not the vehicle described should be allowed in the park. </em>
Tony lives on one side of the city and works on the other. He will save ten minutes if he drives through the park.
Answer:
<u>Tony should not be allowed.</u>
Explanation:
We can make this conclusion because Tony's reasons constitute part of the reasons why the park was closed from vehicles; in other to be undisturbed by traffic or pollution from vehicles.
Hence, it will be reasonable for Tony to use other means of transportation such as a bicycle to go through the park.
Answer: The basic reasoning was that if cities or suburbs had grown into essentially one big lump, then it only made sense for that metropolitan area to be governed as a single unit. It's an idea that is long overdue for a return, as many small central cities today remain ring-fenced by wealthy suburbs sucking the life out of them. ~the week
Answer:
wedlock is no longer in service , also why is this law
I think it C if not the B hope this helps have a great day
