1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maksim [4K]
3 years ago
6

Under SEC rules, filing of the Form 144, required when selling restricted stock, is the responsibility of the:________. A. issue

r B. broker-dealer C. seller D. transfer agent
Business
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: C. seller

Explanation:

The filing of SEC Form 144 is the responsibility of a representative of the company that wishes to sell the stock. The company can be represented by an executive officer, a director, or a recognised affiliate of the company.

This form is filled when the restricted stock to be sold either exceeds 5,000 in number or would command a price greater than $50,000.

You might be interested in
Gloria deposited $500 into a bank account that earned 7. 5% simple interest each year. She earned $225 in interest before closin
timama [110]

The number of years in which the money is in the account is 6 years.

<h3>What is simple interest?</h3>

Simple interest denotes the amount of payment that is received or paid by a person in return for anything pledged or given a loan.

The interest computed on the principal amount for a specified duration of time and rate of interest is called simple interest.

The formula of simple interest:

\text{SI}= \text{P}\times r \times t

Where, (P) stands for principal, (r) for interest rate, and (t) is for the time period.

<u>Computation </u><u>of a number of years:</u>

According to the given information,

P=$500,

r=7.5%,

t=?

SI= $225

Now, substitute the given values in the above formula, we have:

\text{SI}= \text{P}\times r \times t\\\\\$225=\$500\times\ 7.5\%\times t\\\\t= 6 \text{Years}

Therefore, the number of years is 6 years.

To learn more about the simple interest, refer to:

brainly.com/question/2793278

5 0
2 years ago
Chegg - Discuss the differences of productivity measurement in service and manufacturing. Why is productivity improvement more d
Svetllana [295]

Explanation:

The measurement of productivity in service and manufacturing is different in the sense of the ability to measure productivity, as a service has different characteristics that are Intangibility, Inseparability, Variability and Perishability, it is more difficult to measure its productivity, for example, a service is variable, so even if there are standards for the provision of that service, there are issues that will vary and this can change productivity.

There is also the fact that if the productivity measured by the capacity in the service sector is influenced by the loss of quality of the same, as customers may feel hurt if there is a rush in a service provided, for example, so that the service is more productive .

3 0
3 years ago
Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that hi
tangare [24]

Answer:

The correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete because some important figures and points are missing in it. These figures and points are therefore provided to complete the question before answering it as follows:

Charley spends all of his income on soft drinks and pizza. Suppose he is currently buying these products in amounts such that his marginal benefit from an additional soft drink is $100 and his marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza is $110. If the price of a soft drink is $2 and the price of a slice of pizza is $3, is Charley maximizing his total benefits?

A. No, he should increase his consumption of both goods.

B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

C. Yes, there is no other consumption choice that will make his total benefits greater.

D. No, he should shift consumption toward pizza and away from soft drinks to maximize total benefits.'

The explanation of the answer is now provided as follows:

Under utility maximization theory, the condition for the utility or benefit maximization for two goods is as follows:

MBs / Ps = MBp / Pp ……………………………. (1)

Where:

MBs = Marginal benefit from an additional soft drink = $100

MBp = Marginal benefit from an additional slice of pizza =$110

Ps = Price of a soft drink = $2

Pp = Price of a slice of pizza = $3

Subtitling the relevant values, we have:

MBs / Ps = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft drinks = $100 / $2 = 50

MBp / Pp = Marginal utility per dollar spent on soft pizza = $110 / $3 = 36.67

This implies that 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67

The decision rule is that the limited money income should be spent by a consumer on the good which gives the higher marginal utility per dollar in order to maximize marginal benefit.

Since 50 = MBs / Ps > MBp / Pp = 36.67 above, this implies that Charley is NOT maximizing his total benefits. To maximize his total benefits, Charley should consume more of soft drinks and less of pizza until the condition is consistent with equation (1).

Therefore, the correct option is B. No, he should shift consumption toward soft drinks and away from pizza to maximize total benefits.

7 0
2 years ago
Below is the aging of receivables schedule for Evers Industries. Aging-of-Receivables Schedule November 30 Customer Balance Not
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

uncollectible ammount expense 47,972 debit

            allowance for doubtful account    47,972 credit

Explanation:

Fro mthe talbe we are given the amount of account over-time fro meach customer.

As we are presented with all date we should proceed directly with the journal entry:

the aging method stated an allowance of       60,727

the current balance is for                            <u>     (12,755)   </u>

the adjustment will be for:                         <em>       47,972 </em>

5 0
3 years ago
Economists generally argue that:
djverab [1.8K]

Answer: A. costs of moderate inflation are nearly zero whereas high inflation is quite costly.

Explanation:

Economists generally believe that moderate inflation is actually good for the economy as prices need to increase in a healthy manner overtime in order to drive consumption. This means that to them, the cost of moderate inflation is nearly zero.

This is a sharp contrast to high inflation which most economists generally believe to be costly as it reduces the savings of people as well as their real wages and welfare.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the Five-Forces model, conditions under which a supplier group can be powerful include all the following EXCEPT: a. readily a
    5·1 answer
  • All of the following regarding the current ratio are true except: Multiple Choice Current ratio is calculated by dividing curren
    11·2 answers
  • A warrantless search of a vehicle must be based on:
    6·1 answer
  • An operation is located in a jurisdiction that allows it to hold TCS food without temperature control. How many hours can it dis
    9·1 answer
  • Happy​ Valley, Inc. has received an invoice for​ $6,500 with terms of​ 3/15, n/45 and uses the net method to record purchases. I
    15·1 answer
  • Blossom Company purchased a machine with a list price of $168000. They were given a 10% discount by the manufacturer. They paid
    13·1 answer
  • Review the scenario:
    14·2 answers
  • Compute conversion costs given the following data: direct materials, $350,300; direct labor, $205,100; factory overhead, $177,00
    10·1 answer
  • What can accountants do for businesses or individuals?
    6·1 answer
  • At Mighty-Tuf Industrial Products Group, 30 percent of its employees are neither a citizen of the parent company nation nor the
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!