A buyer or seller that pays more of a commodity tax is still
dependent on a specific factor such as the relative price elasticity that are
present or visible because this could greatly affect the commodity tax that the
buyer or seller pays.
Answer:
unethical
Explanation:
According to my research on different business decisions, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is most likely to be challenged as unethical only. This is because despite being morally wrong it is not illegal to do this. In fact the company can decide to pay their employees whatever amount they want as long as it is above minimum wage.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
<h2>Employee D has the largest gross pay among all the four employees.</h2>
Explanation:
Gross pay is normally calculated by taking the sum or aggregation of the basic salary or direct job related benefits and any additional employee benefits obtained by the employee from the company.
Therefore,for employee A,total gross pay=
dollars
For employee B,total gross pay=
For employee C,total gross pay=
For employee D,total gross pay=
Therefore,based on the above calculations of gross pay of all the employees,employee D has the highest or largest gross pay which is $55,300.
Answer:
The-buying manager's-conduct should-be-relied upon to-expand Southern's-hazard by-expanding its-presentation to-potential-supply-deficiencies or-confounded conveyances
Trust in business is an incredibly dubious notion. It depends on the shared fulfillment of included gatherings, and the apparent life span of their relationship. There might be a clouded side to it - regarding "defilement/pay off", "preference", "nepotism" and so forth which may prompt "an underestimated, one-sided demeanor" and in the end bargain "quality" - antagonistically influencing the business' prosperity.
Presently, given this thought, you may acknowledge why Southern Supply Inc. had a buying approach of acquiring its items/administrations from an expanded pool of specialist co-ops. It is actually as the mainstream saying goes - "One-ought not-put-every one of their-eggs-into-one-bin"
Answer:
the marginal revenue product of baseball players is greater than the marginal revenue product of college professors.
Explanation:
Baseball players are responsible for a baseball teams' revenues, and they add up billions of dollars per year. For example, Max Scherzer sells jerseys, caps and other merchandise for millions of dollars, and his team winning the World Series this year increases the team's revenue greatly. Sometimes even without winning a championship some players still generate lots of revenue.
An individual's salary should be proportional to the revenue that they generate. Colleges have huge amounts of revenue, and college professors are responsible for a large portion of it.
The problem hear is that there are a lot of college professors and assistants, and the revenue must be split between many people. For example, Harvard University's revenue is about $5.5 billion per year, but it has over 16,000 employees (including about 2,400 professors).
