Take a look at the statement below: Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers. How could this statement be revised to make
it a hypothesis? Fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not make plants grow. Fish meal is a better fertilizer than artificial fertilizer because fish meal is natural. Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer. Plants that receive artificial fertilizer will be better than plants that receive fish meal.
The correct answer is that Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.
The hypothesis that Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizer. The revised statement to this hypothesis could explain the effect of fish meal which affects the plant in a better way when compared to artificial fertilizers. The plants fed with fish meal will grow taller than plants that are fed with artificial fertilizer.
The question is asking to state which of the following is the revised statement that would make the sentence as a hypothesis, base on my research and analysis, I would say that the answer would be "<span>Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer</span>"
Answer: positive feedback loops enhance or amplify changes. this tends to move a system away from its equilibrium state and make it more unstable. Negative feedbacks tend to dampen or buffer changes. this tends to hold a system to some equilibrium state making it more stable.
A. Chemical modification may allow for extended drug capacities such as expanded spectrum of activity and increased stability.
Explanation:
Any modification in antibiotic structure and chemical will affects its ability in a way to increase it capability of target microbes and act efficiently. These modification can increase half life and stability of the drug.
