Take a look at the statement below: Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers. How could this statement be revised to make
it a hypothesis? Fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not make plants grow. Fish meal is a better fertilizer than artificial fertilizer because fish meal is natural. Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer. Plants that receive artificial fertilizer will be better than plants that receive fish meal.
The correct answer is that Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.
The hypothesis that Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizer. The revised statement to this hypothesis could explain the effect of fish meal which affects the plant in a better way when compared to artificial fertilizers. The plants fed with fish meal will grow taller than plants that are fed with artificial fertilizer.
The question is asking to state which of the following is the revised statement that would make the sentence as a hypothesis, base on my research and analysis, I would say that the answer would be "<span>Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer</span>"
I read about ocean tides. the Moon has an effect on the ocean which causes the ocean to bulge toward the Moon. When the Moon is in alignment with the sun the ocean bulges out more because of the added gravity. The Moon though smaller than the sun has more gravitational pull than the sun.
Explanation: The random change in the gene pool is due to genetic drift. Remember, genetic drift occurs at a more rapid rate when the population size is reduced. The flood is a random occurrence. It could have as easily been a drought.
