Take a look at the statement below: Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizers. How could this statement be revised to make
it a hypothesis? Fish meal is safer than artificial fertilizers, but it does not make plants grow. Fish meal is a better fertilizer than artificial fertilizer because fish meal is natural. Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer. Plants that receive artificial fertilizer will be better than plants that receive fish meal.
The correct answer is that Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer.
The hypothesis that Fish meal is better than artificial fertilizer. The revised statement to this hypothesis could explain the effect of fish meal which affects the plant in a better way when compared to artificial fertilizers. The plants fed with fish meal will grow taller than plants that are fed with artificial fertilizer.
The question is asking to state which of the following is the revised statement that would make the sentence as a hypothesis, base on my research and analysis, I would say that the answer would be "<span>Plants that are fertilized with fish meal will grow taller than plants that receive artificial fertilizer</span>"
Plant cells are the basic unit of life in organisms of the kingdom Plantae. They are eukaryotic cells, which have a true nucleus along with specialized structures called organelles that carry out different functions.They also have a cell wall that provides structural support.
The bright head of the comet Hale-Bopp, called the comma, is shown near the Sun. The combo is made up of dust and gas, concealing a solid comet nucleus made of rock, dust, and ice.
The solid nucleus or core of the hale bopp comet consists mainly of ice and dust coated with black matter, and ice formed mainly of frozen water but possibly other cold substances, such as ammonia, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and methane.
