Answer:
production of different types will compete for limited resources.
Explanation:
The production possibilities model is also known as the Production–possibility frontier. It is the visual model of efficiency and scarcity. It provides the concept of how the economy can change things by using two goods as an example. It determines the trade offs that is associated with the allocation of the resources between the production of the two goods.
The production possibilities curve or model shows the inverse relationship between the two goods and the services as producing different types of products or services will complete for the limited resources available.
An economy has a very limited economic resource and therefore it can produce more number of one good by making only less of some another good.
Answer:
Number of new shares:
= 100,000×(1÷2)
= 50,000
Amount of new investment:
= 50,000×$10
= $500,000
Total value of company after issue:
= $500,000+100,000×$40
= $4,500,000
Total number of shares after issue:
= 100,000+50,000
= 150,000
Share price after issue:
= $4,500,000÷150,000
= $30
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Here, in this question, we are to select which of the options is best.
The correct answer to this question is that in a concentrated network configuration, firms allow each site on the network to operate with full autonomy.
What this means is that each site in the network operate independently of the other sites.
A site is thus an autonomous entity but still part of the concentrated network
1.) data
2.)aptitude
3.)skill
4.)personality trait
5.)intrapersonal
6.) learning style
Answer:
D) Both the landowner and the attorney.
Explanation:
The bank will succeed in obtaining a judgement against both the former landowner and the attorney. The bank can sue either of them or both of them, but it can only collect the $5,000 once.
- When the attorney assumed the mortgage, he expressly promised to pay it. The lender becomes a third party beneficiary of the attorney's promise to pay and can sue him if the mortgage isn't paid.
- The former landowner became secondarily liable to the lender in case the attorney didn't pay.
