Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
Answer: The correct answer is A.
an investor holding 11% of ABC preferred stock
(insider = officer, director, 10% common shareholder or affiliated person)
In a higher Caste. Because the others make absolutely No sense.
The correct answer is: "The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution"
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution was enacted as part of the US Bill of Rights. It protects US citizens against unreasonable searchs and seizures of their properties (performed by the authorities). For a search to be considered reasonabl', a warrant needs to be issued by a judge who appoints to the existence of a 'probable clause' to justify such action.
The correct answer that the statement describes is
elaboration. This is a process used in means of having to develop a certain
thought, idea or information in a way of having to provide a more detailed information
or for the individual to be able to understand it more deeper and further.
