If the statement above asks whether it is true or false. The answer would be true. It is because when you have common knowledge, it is not needed for it to be quoted for it is already common among people and it is already a knowledge of which people knows about without searching or asking about it. Quotation marks are only used when you try to quote or say things that are from the original author, information or who or where it came from and it's not yours. With common knowledge, there is no need to use them for it is already known by a lot of people and are too obvious for it to be asked of.
Answer:
30,154 units
Explanation:
In this question we use the formula of break-even point in unit sales which is shown below:
= (Fixed expenses) ÷ (Contribution margin per unit)
where,
Contribution margin per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable expense per unit
= $15 - $8.5
= $6.5
And, fixed cost is $196,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= ($196,000) ÷ ($6.5)
= 30,154 units
Answer:
because they could be very popular
Explanation:
can you give brainliest
Answer:
the answer is =32291.67.
The firm should take the advantage of the new quantity as the total cost is lesser as compared with the old supplier. the firm can save $340 by approximately taking the advantage of the new quantity discount.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
The Annual demand D = 5000 boxes
The Cost C = $6.4 per each box
The Carrying cost H = 25% of the unit cost = 0.25*6.4 = 1.6
The ordering costs S = $25.00
Now,
EOQ =√2DS/H
EOQ =√(2*5000 * 25)/1.6
Thus,
EOQ =Q = 395.28
The Total cost = DC + (Q/2)H + (D/Q)S
= 5000*6.4 + (395.28 /2) 1.6 + (5000/395.28)25
Then,
T = 32000 + 316.23 + 316.23
= 32632.46
So,
The new supplier has offered to sell the same item for the amount of $6.00 if Q = 3,000 boxes
Hence,
The total cost = 5000 * 6 + (3000/2)1.5 + (5000/3000)25
= 30000 + 2250 + 41.67
= 32291.67
Therefore, The firm should take the advantage of the new quantity as the total cost is lesser as compared with the old supplier. the firm can save $340 by approximately taking the advantage of the new quantity discount.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
