Answer:
The bonds after tax yield is given as Pre tax yield X (1-tax rate)
After Tax Yield = 9% X (1-0.36) = 9%X0.64=5.76%
Answer: 5.76%
Explanation:
The after-tax yield of any financial instrument such as a bond or even stock dividends is the effective yield after the applicable taxes have been paid. Higher the tax rate, lesser is the after-tax yield for the investor.
To calculate your after-tax yield, you need to know both the rate of return on your investment and the tax rate that applies to those profits. First, convert your tax rate that applies to the earnings to a decimal by dividing by 100. Second, subtract the result from 1 to calculate the portion of your earnings that you get to keep after you pay taxes on them. Third, multiply the result by the rate of return on the investment to calculate your after-tax yield.
For example, say that you want to calculate the after-tax rate of return on your certificate of deposit. If your rate of return is 3 percent and the tax rate applied to that interest is 24 percent, start by dividing 24 percent by 100 to get 0.24. Second, subtract 0.24 from 1 to get 0.76 – the portion that you get to keep after accounting for taxes. Finally, multiply 0.76 by your overall rate of return of 3 percent to find your after-tax yield is 2.28 percent.
Answer:
1. On the statement of cash flow record the sale of the asset under the investment section.
2. -$16,000
Explanation:
In Cash flow Statements every asset purchases and sales are viewed as investments, so you record asset sales in the investment section of the cash flow.
Therefore the exact value of the sales is recorded.
<h2><em><u>Question:</u></em></h2>
<em>→</em><em>Marketers segment markets to achieve which of the following objectives?</em>
<h2><u><em>Choices</em><em>:</em></u></h2>
<em>a. To create an offer that best fits the desires of the groups that exist in the </em><em>market.</em>
<em>b. To identify the most appropriate media for advertising,</em>
<em>C. To better understand their target segments.</em>
<h2><em><u>Answer:</u></em></h2>
- <em>a. To create an offer that best fits the desires of the groups that exist in the </em><em>market.</em>
<h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2>
<em>→</em><em>marketing efficiency by directing effort specifically toward the designated segment in a manner consistent with that segment's characteristics.</em>
<em>#</em><em>B</em><em>r</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>e</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em>B</em><em>u</em><em>n</em><em>c</em><em>h</em>
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.