Answer:
is made if it is more likely than not that the liability has been incurred.
Explanation:
When contingent liability is recorded it is recorded by debiting income statement and creating a liability in balance sheet, also it is not accounted for until the amount of liability is pretty certain as without being clear about its occurrence and the amount involved the liability cannot be recorded.
There is no such loss account, there exists only income statement.
Therefore, with the above we can conclude that contingent liability is recorded only if:
is made if it is more likely than not that the liability has been incurred.
Answer:
$90
Explanation:
Nominal GDP is GDP calculated using current year prices.
Nominal GDP = current year prices x unit of output
18 x $5 = $90
Gross domestic product is the total sum of final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year
Answer:
Carpenter will have to pay taxes for a recognized gain of $150,000
Explanation:
When you are calculating taxes, you must use the adjusted a¿basis of the buildings.
Paul is exchanging a $450,000 building + $75,000 in cash for a $375,000 office building.
Paul's realized loss = $525,000 - $375,000 = $150,000
therefore Carpenter's recognized gain = $150,000
Answer:
(a) = $468
(b) = 52%
(c) = $144
(d) = 28%
(e) = $1150
(f) = $920
Explanation:
selling price variable cost contribution margin contribution ratio
1. $900 $432 (a) $ (b)%
2. $200 $ (c) $56 (d)%
3. $ (e) $(f) $230 20%
contribution = selling price - variable costs
Margin contribution ratio = contribution / sales
Variable cost = selling price - contribution
Selling price = contribution / margin contribution ratio
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
