This is an example of
"<span>
disinterested rule-making".</span>
Interested and disinterested rules are the two sorts of rules
that are characterized by enthusiasm for good. There are those that emerge out
of want to secure private property, and those that endeavor to direct and
control the conduct of people, disinterested
being the latter one.
What's the question you're trying to ask?
While the constitution is the law of the land it still lacked some things. The founding fathers knew that future government may take advantage of it, so they added the bill of rights and allowed for more amendments. The bill of rights which are the first ten amendments state that people have a freedom of speech and religion, the right to bare arms,the right to a fair trial ect. Other amendments provide for things like women suffrage.
I believe the answer is: <span> false dilemma
</span><span> false dilemma refers to a sitaution when people falsely attribute a causal relationship situation while ignoring other additional option.
</span>In most cases, false dilemma is intentionally stated by a person in order to force the outcome of the conversation.