The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice "<span>Russia was less economically developed than England and relied on a strong monarch to address the nation’s issues."
</span>In Britain, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill <span>of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ('A Limited Monarchy') are much older than that, as seen in our Magna Carta.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
nope I do not think so a lot of people waste their money in a lot if things
in 2012 the top 0.6% of world population or the 42 million richest people in the world tell 39.3% of world wealth the next 4.4% health 32.3% of world wealth
but this is a interpretive question it's an opinionative question
I think false because didn’t the pilgrims escape for freedom? So I think it’s false
The Middle Colonies had lots of fertile soil, which allowed the area to become a major exporter of wheat and other grains. The lumber and shipbuilding industries enjoyed success in the Middle Colonies because of the abundant forests, and Pennsylvania saw moderate success in the textile and iron industry.
Amen. this is a great life lesson to keep in mind
