Answer:
bipedalism and non-honing chewing
Explanation:
Although you did not present the text to which the question refers, we can confirm that two mandatory characteristics in a hominid are bipedal locomotion (also known as bipedalism) and non-honing chewing.
The hominid was a group of great primates that was one of the ancestors of the human race. As an ancestor, he had characteristics similar to the characteristics we have today. Among these characteristics we can mention the movement on two legs, also known as bipedalism and non-honing chewing.
I think that the key point here is the "easily reproducible" - because all of them can be scientific questions (even a! it could tell us about about the human psyche!)
but d. is the best answer for a reproducible experiment. B could also make a good experiment, but it would be too expensive to be easily reproducible. C is calling for a more complex analysis that is too complex for an experiment. And a would require more questionnaires than experiments
Answer: Groupthink
Explanation:
Groupthink could be defined as a scenario when a group uniformly agrees to a decision whether it's right or wrong, make the decision together and resist any other form of reasoning. Groupthink occurs most times when a group is tired of constructive analysis and criticism of what they are asked to decide on. It encourages bad decision and allow members of the team ignore problems and solutions to solving problem
The group Stephanie was handling experienced a Groupthink, where everyone just went with the same decision irrespective of whether it was right or wrong.
The answer that will fill in the blank is unconditional positive regard, this is the concept that will complete the sentence and in the same time it was Carl Rogers who is responsible of developing it. The unconditional positive regard focuses on having to feel other people's support and their acceptance. In whatever means or circumstances that the other people are in.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Individuals have a great deal of control when it comes to their day-to-day actions.
Explanation:
Free-will can be understood as the possibility of choosing between differente courses of action.
The concept of free-will has been studied for over centuries by psychology, philosophy, religion, the arts, and so on, at it states that individuals are able to decide which path to follow in life, decisions to make, etc.
The contrary to free-will is determinism which states that individuals only follow a previously written or stablished life-path.
In conclusion, the statement that a free-will defendant is most likely to believe is: Individuals have a great deal of control when it comes to their day-to-day actions.
