Answer:
The Correct answer is "The Company’s cost of branded pair sold in the Asia-Pacific region was barely below the industry average".
Explanation:
At the point when the working benefits of the Company's Cost of branded pair sold in the Asia-Pacific district is below the normal of industry-high qualities, the organization's expense of branded pair sold in that area turns out to be subsequently a legitimate sign that there is positively Company's too high relative expense in atleast one components that it enjoys.
I would say hide it under your seat or between your seat. or your trunk
Answer:
2.8%
Explanation:
The formula to calculate value of a perpetuity is as follow:
V = Annuity payment in year 1 / (r-g)
V: Value of the perpetuity
r: Discount rate
g: Growth rate (missing value)
By inputting numbers into the formula, we have:
6225.81 = 386 / (0.09 - g)
--> g = 2.8%
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": The statement presents the fallacy of composition.
Explanation:
The Fallacy of composition refers to a fallacy by which an individual believes that something is true just because part of the whole is true. Typically, this type of belief leads to mistaken conclusions because what might be right for one person does not necessarily is right for others.
Answer:
The answer is letter A. TRUE
Explanation:
Because under IFRS firms tipically use the cost recovery method iif they conclude that the percentage of completion method is not appropriate to account for a long term contract.