1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olganol [36]
3 years ago
9

Larry Gaines, a single taxpayer, age 42, sells his personal residence on November 12, 2019, for $151,200. He lived in the house

for 7 years. The expenses of the sale are $9,072, and he has made capital improvements of $10,150. Larry’s cost basis in his residence is $86,750. On November 30, 2019, Larry purchases and occupies a new residence at a cost of $150,000. Calculate Larry’s realized gain, recognized gain, and the adjusted basis of his new residence.
Business
1 answer:
damaskus [11]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1. Recognized gain = $54300

2. Realized gain = $45228

3. Adjusted basis of new asset = $150,000

Explanation:

The adjusted basis is the net cost of an asset after it has had depreciation deductions and/or capital expenditure increments. In other words, its actual worth at that particular point in time.

The amount realized is the fair market value and the sum of any money received at the sale of an asset.

1. A recognized gain or loss is the difference between the amount realized from the sale of the asset and the asset's adjusted basis on the time of its sale. A positive figure proves to be a gain and a negative figure proves to be a loss. In other words, when an asset is sold for a price higher than what it is actually worth at the time of sale, it is a recognized gain whilst if it is sold for a price lower than what its net cost is, it is a recognized loss.

In the current scenario:

The amount realized from the sale of the asset is $151,200.

Adjusted basis = Cost basis + capital improvements

Hence, $86,750 + $10,150 = $96900

Recognized gain/loss = $151,200 - $96900 = $54300

Due to the fact that it is a positive figure, i.e. amount realized at sale of asset is higher than the adjusted basis, it is a recognized gain.

2. A realized gain is the amount of <em>actual money</em> earned at sale. It does not simply look at the income from sale, but also takes into account any expenses that were present at the time of sale and deducts these.

In this case, there was an expense of the sale of $9072.

Hence, amount realized from sale of asset is $151200 - $9072 = $142128

Realized gain = $142128 - $96900 = $45228

3. Adjusted basis of new residence

The new residence has not had any capital increments. Hence, the adjusted basis is the same as the cost i.e. $150,000.

You might be interested in
The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling </u>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <u>rising</u>.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u>  rising </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u>.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> </u><em><u>falling </u></em>and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>rising</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is<u> falling.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is <u> </u><em><u> rising</u></em><u> </u> and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <em><u>at a minimum</u></em>.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is<u> rising.</u>

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is <u>at a minimum</u> at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0
3 years ago
Stock A has an expected return of 15 percent and the standard deviation of its returns is 20 percent. Stock B has an expected re
kiruha [24]

Answer:

Stock A will be preferable for the risk averse Investors.

Explanation:

The reason is that risk is the measure of the vulnerability of the returns on the investment made which means if the return on the investment has greater vulnerability of returns then it is highly risky. So the risk averse investor would prefer stock A with lower risk.

(Special comments:

It must be noted that the higher return shows that the investment is also highly risky because nobody is going to give you more with low risk associated investments. This means lower return on Stock B is also preferable here for the risk averse investor because it carries lower risks.)

4 0
3 years ago
In taking a physical inventory at the end of Year 1, Grant Company forgot to count certain units and understated ending inventor
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

a. Overstates Year 1 cost of goods sold.

b. Understates Year 1 net income

c. Understates Year 2 cost of goods sold

Explanation:

a. The formula for Calculating the Cost of Goods sold is;

<em>Cost of Goods Sold = Opening inventory + Purchases - Closing inventory.</em>

If the closing inventory is understated, it will reduced the amount being subtracted from Purchases and Opening inventory which would means that Cost of Goods sold will be overstated.

b. The Cost of goods sold is deducted from sales to give Gross profit. If Cost of goods is overstated, it will reduce Gross Profit higher than it should. A lower Gross Profit equates to a lower Net Income.

c. Going by the formula in <em>a;</em>

<em>Cost of Goods Sold = Opening inventory + Purchases - Closing inventory.</em>

In Year 2, the understated Year 1 closing stock will become the understated Year 2 Opening stock. With the opening stock understated, the Cost of goods will be understated as well because Opening stock is meant to increase Cost of goods sold as the formula shows. If it is understated, the amount that it will add will be understated as well.

4 0
3 years ago
During July at Pool Company, $65,000 of raw materials were requisitioned from the storeroom for use in production. These raw mat
QveST [7]

Answer:

$4,000

Explanation:

Preparation of the journal entry.

Based on the information given we were told that The indirect materials totaled the amount of $4,000 which means that the appropriate journal entry to record this requisition would include a DEBIT TO MANUFACTURING OVERHEAD of the amount of $4,000.

(To record requisition)

6 0
3 years ago
when firms manage the return of goods from consumers either because they are defective or for recycling purposes, they are invol
Vladimir [108]

Reverse logistics is the process by which businesses handle the return of consumer items for recycling or because they are defective.

Supply chain management that sends goods back from buyers to sellers or producers is known as reverse logistics. Reverse logistics are needed for procedures like returns or recycling after a customer receives a product. Reverse logistics begin at the customer and work their way backward through the supply chain to the producer or the distributor. Reverse logistics can also refer to procedures where the customer is in charge of the product's final disposal, such as recycling, refurbishing, or resale.

To learn more about Reverse Logistics here

brainly.com/question/15888400

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Leon is catering a luncheon. He is only supplying the food. What kind of catering service is he providing?
    7·1 answer
  • Because the demand for wheat tends to be inelastic. True or False
    13·1 answer
  • Lucas is running a lemonade stand on a hot day. He initially charges 25 cents a glass and is selling lots of lemonade. He decide
    9·1 answer
  • Scott is a manager at a large electronics company. His primary role within the organization is to plan for the "people needs" of
    9·1 answer
  • Mark Weinstein has been working on an advanced technology in laser eye surgery. His technology will be available in the near ter
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me quickly
    15·2 answers
  • A price-cutting tactic may backfire if
    7·1 answer
  • Hudson Corporation will pay a dividend of $2.78 per share next year. The company pledges to increase its dividend by 4.5 percent
    15·1 answer
  • The motion study chart that describes the movements of both hands at the same time is a: Multiple Choice simo chart. gang proces
    9·1 answer
  • Ngày 1/9/N, doanh nghiệp mua một lô hàng X, giá mua trên hóa đơn: 50.000. Giá cước vận chuyển lô hàng này về kho: 6.000; chi phí
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!