Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
It's the other way around. Their research shows that when the canadians put in the same situation, their judgement regarding acts of violence actually similar and consistent with the judgement made by the americans.
(this research finding is a little bit surprising because Canadians are more well known to have a more polite and gentle culture)
In general , their judgement regarding acts of violence can be influenced by their primal human instincts.
For example, the research showed that:
- both canadians and Americans overwhelmingly approved that acts of violence are justifiable if being done toward people who are broken into their house.
- Both Canadians and Americans overwhelmingly disapproved of acts of violence toward group of protesters.
The true statement here is :
c. Teens will tend to start smoking if they believe that it is okay to smoke
Explanation:
The rest of the statements here have amounts of truth in them too. IT is seen that authoritative environments lead children to rebel and become smokers but it is no way the only way people start smoking.
The age for smoking varies too from culture to culture. IT is usually in the age that kids start going out frequently that they start to smoke.
Lastly it is to be seen if the culture that the children live in actually recognizes smoking as legitimate or part of the culture, then they have a high chance of becoming smokers.
Answer:
christmas eve, christmas day, and boxing day i presume
Explanation:
Answer:
Isolates
Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.
Bystanders
Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.
Participants
Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.
Activists
Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.
Diehards
Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The possible standard ethics maintained is a little bit difficult but it an important aspect of government ethics rules. These ethics are based on universal disease condition and associated patients' needs are enhanced by the fact that the mainline western medicine disease is understood by using widely agreed-upon scientific categories. Whatever the research has done in medicine line all needs, at last, subjects.
The ethical standards also created for medical treatment. Medical technology shapes both clinical and medical diseases. Modern medicine research in effects seems able to generate medical ethics which transcends particular ethics which transcendence particular research disease, illness. Patients' and patients' related research must be treated with respect and what we called informed consent. Ethical requirements are the same in all cultures. All physical torture was banned by the government done by the physician during medical research.
