Answer:
-jerry is entitled to monetary damages compensations due to a contract breach.
-Freddy has to pay Jerry $90
Explanation:
the damage that the gym is entitled to would be that of a contract breach. Freddy wanted to earn more money so he breached the contract. Now given that Jerry had to go with another supplier of water at a greater cost of 50 dollars for 9 months, just to satisfy his requirements. Freddy has to pay him monetary damages for this breach in contract. he has to pay the difference that exists between the price in the contract they had and what jerry now has to pay due to the breach. The difference is 10 dollars, which is to be paid every month for 9 months
= (50 - 40)*9
= 10 * 9 = $90
I think the appropriate response is the boundaries of the firm. It is exercised in the vertical chain a firm ought to perform itself and which it ought to buy from autonomous firms in the market. Specifically, the most powerful work amid the most recent two decades on why firms exist, and what decides their limits, has been fixated on what has come to be known as the ''hold-up issue.
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that these processes are known as outsourcing. This term or process is when a company hires another company in which the hired company agrees to be responsible for an activity or process that could be done internally but which the company has decided not to. Such as in this scenario since a third party (completely unrelated company) is handling all of the logistics division of the company.
Answer:
d. beyond some point, the production costs of additional units of output will rise
Explanation:
To answer this question you need to know the concept of marginal productivity. This concept is associated with input productivity and aims to explain how many inputs are needed to produce one more unit of output. Firms seek to produce more units with fewer inputs. Thus, the ideal is for marginal productivity to be increasing. This can happen over time as production increases. However, at some point marginal productivity will decrease and this will increase production costs if the firm does not stop producing.
To be clear, follow an example. Imagine that a pizza parlor uses two employees to produce 5 pizzas per hour. Now imagine that the pizza factory is experiencing increased demand for pizza and hiring more an employee. Now the pizzeria has hired 1 more employee and produces 10 pizzas. Note that hiring 1 employee increased the total productivity of the pizzeria. Previously 5 pizzas were produced by 2 employees, an average of 2.5 pizzas per employee. After hiring the third employee, this production increased to 3.3 pizzas per employee. Now imagine that the pizzeria hires 3 more employees and produces only 14 pizzas, an average of 2.3 pizzas per employee. In this case, productivity decreased due to structural factors, such as the number of ovens and the size of the pizzeria. Therefore, in the long run, production costs tend to increase when firms increase production greatly.
Answer:
sales representative hope this you plz rate me as brainliest and thx
