Answer:
Stereotype threat
Explanation:
Stereotype threat refers to a situation when people from a certain groups is under performing when doing a certain task because they feel pressured that they will perpetuated a negative stereotype about their group if they fail to fulfill a certain expectation.
Let's take black athletes for example,
There is a negative stereotype in united states that they are better than any other group in term of physical ability but less so when doing activities that require intelligence. (For example, you will often heard NFL fans point out that quarterback position held mostly by white athletes because they're smarter)\
When a student who are aware for this stereotyped are asked to perform an activity that require intelligence, they will feel overwhelming pressure to over perform because they fear that other black students' characteristics will be measured by his/her performance. In this end, this pressure prevent that student from fulfilling his/her full potential.
Answer:
The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill enacted in 1937, commonly known as the "court-packing plan", was a legislative measure proposed by Roosevelt's goverment that intended to add more justices to the US Supreme Court.
The ultimate aim of much measure was to the obtain the approval of certain provisions of the New Deal that had been declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court. The enactment of the bill would grant the president the power to appoint one justice for every member of the court that was older than 70 years and 6 months. He would be able to appoint a maximum of 6 judges.
The detractors of the bill claimed that it posed a threat to the system of checks and balances that keeps the equilibrium between the three branches of power in the US: legislative, executive and judiciary. The enactment of the bill would give the executive power the chance to interfere in the judiciary by appointing justices, with the ultimate aim of influencing a decision that was convenient for the goverment.
Answer:D
Explanation: tell me if I’m right I want to know
Hope this helps:)
<span>This is a false statement. It was considered to be a supplemental source of income to people who had recently retired from their jobs. Regular monthly benefits did not take effect for workers until early in 1940, and these benefits were expanded to include the worker's spouse and children.</span>