Answer:
False
Explanation:
Kevin should not rise the level of production from 5 to 6 as the impact of the price dominates this situation
Also the market is not depend on the Kevin fire engines because of the competitive market
Plus the supply and demand relation is inverse and not depend on the change in price level in a competitive market
If the price is decreased from $160,000 to $120,000 so the quantity of the production would not be impacted
In addition to this, the total revenue could be impacted when there is a reduction in the price that produced more sale due to this there is a slightly change in upward and downward
Also the change would never be in the similar production as compare to the change in price
Therefore the given statement is false
Unions are still popular, but not as popular as they were in the late 19th century and early 20th century, because there is more capital circulation, which generally means better conditions for laborers.
If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
C) Debit Cash $2,750
Credit Accounts Receivable $2,750
Explanation:
When payment is received in respect of services rendered or goods sold in the past periods, the accounting rule is to debit cash or bank as the case may be and credit account receivable for the amount received. This is necessary because in period when transaction took place, revenue has been credited and account receivable debited.
Answer:
$6,900
Explanation:
When you use the incremental cost allocation method, you must rank cost activities and how they will be allocated. In this case, department 2 is the primary user, and therefore, rental costs must be allocated first to them. Rental costs will be allocated at a $25/hour rate.
Since department 1 is the next user, 100 hours will be allocated using the same rate as department 2, but the next 200 hours will be allocated at the lower $22/hour rate. Total rental cost allocation to department 1 = (100 x $25) + (200 x $22) = $2,500 + $4,400 = $6,900
